ry to The Microsoft Research
> – University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology Scarl,
> Piazza Manifattura 1, 38068 Rovereto (TN), Italy.
> P Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to
>
--
Dario Rigolin
Comperio srl - CTO
Mobile: +39 347 7232652 - Office: +39 0425 471482
Skype: dario.rigolin
tion
> occured when talking to server at: null
>
> Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException
>
>
>
> Server 6:
>
> + org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: Timeout occured while
> waiting response from server at:
> http://server6:8983/solr/mycollection_shard2_replica_n15/select
>
> + + org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: Timeout occured
> while waiting response from server at: Timeout occured while waiting
> response from server at:
> http://server4:8983/mycollection_shard6_replica_n23/select
>
>
>
> I tried search google but didn't find any clue :(! Do you help me how to
> find the cause. thank you!
>
>
>
>
>
--
Dario Rigolin
Comperio srl - CTO
Mobile: +39 347 7232652 - Office: +39 0425 471482
Skype: dario.rigolin
GB of indexes.
>
> Is there a possibility that the error happens when I do forceMerge on the
> big core
> (which I believe optimize needs temporarily 3 times spaces of index-size)?
> Or is there any other possibility to cause the error?
>
>
> Any Clues are very helpful.
>
>
dir.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Vincenzo
> >
> > --
> > mobile: 3498513251
> > skype: free.dev
> >
> > > On 26 Feb 2020, at 19:44, Massimiliano Randazzo <
> > massimiliano.randa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Il giorno
lem
>
>
> 1
> 0
> name="maxCommitAge">1DAYfalse
>
>
>
> Thanks for your consideration
> Massimiliano Randazzo
>
--
Dario Rigolin
Comperio srl - CTO
Mobile: +39 347 7232652 - Office: +39 0425 471482
Skype: dario.rigolin
if this were so, is it
> > still
> > > > necessary to run the Optimize command from my application when I have
> > > > finished indexing? I noticed that the Optimized function requires
> > > > considerable time and resources especially in large databases
> > > >
&
forgotten or am I wrong?
>
> Excuse the stupid questions but I'm seeing Solr for the first time
> thank you all
>
--
Dario Rigolin
Comperio srl - CTO
Mobile: +39 347 7232652 - Office: +39 0425 471482
Skype: dario.rigolin
. And it only expands for the current page.
Are you finding situations where there are group heads on the page, that
have child documents that are not being expanded?
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Dario Rigolin wrote:
I'm using Solr 4.10.
I'm using Solr 4.10.1 and FieldCollapsing but when adding expand=true
and activating ExpandComponent the expanded section into result contains
only one group head and not all group heads present into the result.
I don't know if this is the intended behaviour. Using a query q=*:* the
expanded sec
all this
java class if any exists.
If not I need to implement my self and any help pointing me to a existing code
inside solr it will be appreciated (Example where solr prepare the response to
a query).
Thank you.
-
Dario Rigolin
drigo...@gmail.com
es this is the expected behavior for TermComponent? Any suggestion about how
to solve this?
We use TermComponent to do a smart autocomplete about values on fields.
Thank you
---
Comperio srl
Dario Rigolin
eed to put OR on the query
Best regards.
Dario Rigolin
Comperio srl (Italy)
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 04:58:43 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
It seems fixed by setting into WordDelimiterTokenizer
catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0"
Instead of "1" on both...
Nice to know...
> On Thursday, March 10, 2011 04:53:51 pm Juan Grande wrote
arch(IndexSearcher.java:208)
at org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher.search(Searcher.java:88)
> Regards,
> *
> Juan G. Grande*
> -- Solr Consultant @ http://www.plugtree.com
> -- Blog @ http://juanggrande.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:45 PM,
I have a text field indexed using WordDelimeter
Indexed in that way
S.#L.W.VI.37
...
Serching in that way:
http://192.168.3.3:8983/solr3.1/core0/select?q=myfield:("S.#L.W.VI.37")
Makes this error:
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse 'myfield:("S.':
Lexical error at line
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:42:49 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
> On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:36:40 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
>
> Sorry wrong query:
>
> q=field1:("A BB1" AND "B BB2")
>
> Dario
q=field1:("A BB1 B BB2"~10)
I discovered t
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:36:40 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
Sorry wrong query:
q=field1:("A BB1" AND "B BB2")
Dario
I think this question is more related to Lucene query search but I'm posting
here becuase I feel more "Solr User" :-)
I have multiple value field named field1 containint codes separated by a space
doc1
A BB1 B BB2 C BB3
A CC1 B CC2 C CC3
doc2
A BB1 B FF2 C FF3
A YY1 B BB2 C KK3
I would like
On Monday, November 15, 2010 11:18:47 am Lance Norskog wrote:
> This is more complex than you need. The Solr update command can accept
> streamed data, with the stream.url and stream.file options. You can just
> use solr/update with stream.url=http://your.machine/your.php.script and
> it will read
I'm looking to index data in Solr using a PHP page feeding the index.
In my application I have all docs allready "converted" to a solr/add xml
document and I need to make solr able to get all changed documents into the
index. Looking at DIH I decidec to use URLDataSource and useSolrAddSchema=true
Looking at DataImporter I'm not sure if it's possible to import using a
standard ... xml document representing a document add operation.
Generating is quite expensive in my application and I have cached
all those documents into a text column into MySQL database.
It will be easier for me to "push
21 matches
Mail list logo
