enable debugQuery and compare the queries evaluated in the development
and production environment.
Regards,
Jayendra
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:18 AM, alx...@aim.com wrote:
Hello,
I have build solr-3.4.0 data folder in dev server and copied it to prod
server. Made a search for a keyword,
You can pass the full url to post.jar as an argument.
example -
java -Durl=http://localhost:8080/solr/update -jar post.jar
Regards,
Jayendra
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:37 AM, 刘浪 liu.l...@eisoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to use post.jar to delete index.But my port is 8080. It is 8983
default.
.
Regards
Ahsan
- Original Message -
From: Jayendra Patil jayendra.patil@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Ahson Iqbal mianah...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: question about Field Collapsing/ grouping
The time we implemented
yup .. seems the group count feature is included now, as mentioned by Klein.
Regards,
Jayendra
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:27 AM, O. Klein kl...@octoweb.nl wrote:
Isn't that what the parameter group.ngroups=true is for?
--
View this message in context:
The time we implemented the feature, there was no straight forward solution.
What we did is to facet on the grouped by field and counting the facets.
This would give you the distinct count for the groups.
You may also want to check the Patch @
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242,
you should be able to do it using ${feed-source.last-update}
You can find examples and explaination @
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
Regards,
Jayendra
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, penela pen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
This might probably be a stupid question, but I can't find
For indexing the webpages, you can use Nutch with Solr, which would do
the scarping and indexing of the page.
For finding similar documents/pages you can use
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis, by querying the above
document (by id or search terms) and it would return similar documents
from
you might want to check - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermVectorComponent
Should provide you with the term vectors with a lot of additional info.
Regards,
Jayendra
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
gabri...@mysimpatico.com wrote:
Hello,
This time I'm trying to duplicate Luke's
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler may help.
Regards,
Jayendra
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Moinsn felix.wieg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Good Morning,
I have to set up a Solr System to seek in documents like pdf and doc. My
Solr System is running in the meantime, but i
Solr doesn't index the content of the files, but just the file names.
you can apply patch -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2416
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2332
Regards,
Jayendra
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Jagdish Kumar
jagdish.thapar...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi
You can test the standalone content extraction with the tika-app.jar -
Command to output in text format -
java -jar tika-app-0.8.jar --text file_path
For more options java -jar tika-app-0.8.jar --help
Use the correct tika-app version jar matching the Solr build.
Regards,
Jayendra
On Wed, Aug
Try using -
str name=hl.tag.pre![CDATA[b]]/str
str name=hl.tag.post![CDATA[/b]]/str
Regards,
Jayendra
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Massimo Schiavon mschia...@volunia.com wrote:
In my Solr (3.3) configuration I specified these two params:
str name=hl.simple.pre![CDATA[b]]/str
you can give it a try with the facet.sort.
We had such a requirement for sorting facets by order determined by
other field and had to resort to a very crude way to get through it.
We pre-pended the facets values with the order in which it had to be
displayed ... and used the facet.sort to sort
Strange .. the only other difference that I see is the different
configurations for the word delimiter filter, with the catenatewords
and catenatenumbers @ index and query but it should not impact normal
word searches.
As others suggested, you may just want to use the same chain for both
Index
Hi Denis,
The order of the filter during index time and query time are different
e.g. the synonyms filter.
Do you have a custom synonyms text file which may be causing the issues ?
It usually works fine if you have the same filter order during Index
and Query time. You can try out.
Regards,
Do you mean the replication happens everytime you restart the server ?
If so, you would need to modify the events you want the replication to happen.
Check for the replicateAfter tag and remove the startup option, if you
don't need it.
requestHandler name=/replication
just a suggestion ...
If the shards are know, you can add them as the default params in the
requesthandler so they are added always. and the URL would just have
the qt parameter.
As the limit for uri is browser dependent.
How are you querying solr .. any client api ?? through browser ??
is
on this thread - if you manage to test the patches before me, let me know
how you get on.
Thanks and kind regards,
Gary.
On 11/04/2011 05:02, Jayendra Patil wrote:
The migration of Tika to the latest 0.8 version seems to have
reintroduced the issue.
I was able to get this working again
,
Gary.
On 25/01/2011 16:48, Jayendra Patil wrote:
Hi Gary,
The latest Solr Trunk was able to extract and index the contents of the
zip
file using the ExtractingRequestHandler.
The snapshot of Trunk we worked upon had the Tika 0.8 snapshot jars and
worked pretty well.
Tested again
Can you please attach the other files.
It doesn't seem to find the enable.master property, so you may want to
check the properties file exists on the box having issues
We have the following configuration in the core :-
Core -
- solrconfig.xml - Master Slave
Just a suggestion ..
You can try using dynamic fields by appending the company name (or ID)
as prefix ... e.g.
For data -
Employee ID Employer FromDate ToDate
21345
IBM 01/01/04 01/01/06
MS 01/01/07 01/01/08
BT 01/01/09 Present
Index data as :-
Employee ID - 21345
Employer Name - IBM MS BT
Why not just add an extra field to the document in the Index for the
user, so you can easily filter out the results on the user field and
show only the documents submitted by the User.
Regards,
Jayendra
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:20 AM, satya swaroop satya.yada...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
In that case, you may want to store the groups as multivalued fields
who would have access to the document.
A filter query on the user group should have the results filtered as
you expect.
you may also check Apache ManifoldCF as suggested by Szott.
Regards,
Jayendra
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:46
Dismax does not support boolean queries, you may try using Extended
Dismax for the boolean support.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553
Regards,
Jayendra
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
The Dismax search
Hi Kaushik,
If the field is being treated as blobs, you can try using the
FieldStreamDataSource mapping.
This handles the blob objects to extract contents from it.
This feature is available only after Solr 3.1, I suppose.
you can use the ScriptTransformer to perform the boost calcualtion and addition.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#ScriptTransformer
dataConfig
script