Re: Deploying Solr 1.3 in JBoss 5

2010-02-05 Thread Luca Molteni
Done. L.M. On 5 February 2010 12:56, Sascha Szott wrote: > Hi Luca, > > could you add a note to the Wiki page [1]. Thanks! > > -Sascha > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJBoss > > Luca Molteni wrote: >> >> Bye the way, I finally solved it. >>

Re: Deploying Solr 1.3 in JBoss 5

2010-02-05 Thread Luca Molteni
Bye the way, I finally solved it. To deploy solr 1.3 in jboss 5, you simply have to remove xercesImpl-2.8.1.jar xml-apis-1.3.03.jar >From the WEB-INF/lib folder of solr.war Solr will use the lib provided by jboss 5. Thank you again. L.M. On 3 February 2010 10:38, Luca Molteni wr

Re: Deploying Solr 1.3 in JBoss 5

2010-02-03 Thread Luca Molteni
y 2010 18:02, Sascha Szott wrote: > Luca Molteni wrote: >> >> Actually, if I hard-code the value, it gives me the same error... >> interesting. > > According to the error message: > > The content of element type "env-entry" must match > "(description?

Re: Deploying Solr 1.3 in JBoss 5

2010-02-02 Thread Luca Molteni
L.M. On 2 February 2010 17:14, Sascha Szott wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if that's a Solr issue. However, what happens if you set > env-entry-value to C:/mypath/solr instead of ${solr.home.myhome}? > > -Sascha > > Am 02.02.2010 15:20, schrieb Luca Molteni:

Re: Deploying Solr 1.3 in JBoss 5

2010-02-02 Thread Luca Molteni
han Solr 1.4? > > Sorry, but I don't know about the JBoss issues first hand myself. > >        Erik > > > On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Luca Molteni wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> I'm having some problem deploying solr to JBoss 5. >> >> The

Deploying Solr 1.3 in JBoss 5

2010-02-02 Thread Luca Molteni
Hello list, I'm having some problem deploying solr to JBoss 5. The problem is with environment variables: Following this page of the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJBoss I've added to the web.xml of WEB-INF of solr solr/home java.lang.String ${solr.home.myhome} Since I'm

Re: debugging javascript DIH

2009-12-17 Thread Luca Molteni
Of course you can. Just use remote debugging. Which app server are you using? IDE? L.M. 2009/12/3 Joel Nylund : > is there a way to print to std out or anything from my javascript DIH > transformer? > > thanks > Joel >

Re: Problem in Date Unmarshalling from NamedListCodec.

2009-01-21 Thread Luca Molteni
I've solved the problem. It was a time zone problem. :) L.M. 2009/1/21 Luca Molteni : > Hello list, > > Using SolrJ with Solr 1.3 stable, namedlistcodec unmarshal in readVal > method (line 161) the number > > 119914200 > > as a date (1 January 2008), >

Problem in Date Unmarshalling from NamedListCodec.

2009-01-21 Thread Luca Molteni
Hello list, Using SolrJ with Solr 1.3 stable, namedlistcodec unmarshal in readVal method (line 161) the number 119914200 as a date (1 January 2008), While executing the same query with the solr administration console, it gives me a different date value: 2007-12-31T23:00:00Z It seems like

Re: dataimport handler with mysql: wrong field mapping

2008-12-15 Thread Luca Molteni
Have you tried using the options in the schema.xml? After the indexing, take a look to the fields DIH has generated. Bye, L.M. 2008/12/15 jokkmokk : > > HI, > > I'm desperately trying to get the dataimport handler to work, however it > seems that it just ignores the field name mapping. > I

Re: How to handle large field values.

2008-11-05 Thread Luca Molteni
he unique id field also. > because if fl is mentioned it returns only the mentioned one > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Luca Molteni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Uhm, this works great when using only one server, because I can >> specify the fields in the config

Re: How to handle large field values.

2008-11-05 Thread Luca Molteni
be added to the defaults for your search > handler in solrconfig.xml > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Luca Molteni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > dealing with very large fields, let's say text documents, I found that there > > is

How to handle large field values.

2008-11-05 Thread Luca Molteni
Hello everybody, dealing with very large fields, let's say text documents, I found that there is a global slowness (on my computer) in returning those field. Since most of the time what we want is an "highlight" value of the field and not the entire field, I thought that we can omit these field f

Re: Standard analyzer and acronyms

2008-09-25 Thread Luca Molteni
ause, presumably, your stop words are > all lower-case. > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > - Original Message > > From: Luca Molteni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >

Standard analyzer and acronyms

2008-09-22 Thread Luca Molteni
Hello, list. I found some strange results using the standard analyzer. I've put it in both query and index time, but when I use the schema browser to see the commond values for field, i find: spa1558 s.p.a. 833 Which is pretty strange, since I've used the analyzer to remove the dots from the ac

Re: Searching for Index-Time Boosting in FAQ

2008-09-15 Thread Luca Molteni
> field tag in the XML. > > For example: > > >value > > > > In the same manner, boost can also be specified on the document tag to > boost > the score for the whole document. > > This information is not very prominent in the wiki but some documentation >

Searching for Index-Time Boosting in FAQ

2008-09-15 Thread Luca Molteni
Hello, dear Solr Users, I'm starting to learn Solr and Lucene, since I want to use this technology in my project, but I found some trouble in the "index-time boosting" section of the documentation, I'm probably missing something, but since I can't figure out all by myself, I decided to wrote here.