Re: Collapse Expand

Using json facet api for nested faceting on the docValues. Trying to improve the query time and I read in a blog that query time on docValue can be improved with collapse expand. On 22-Aug-2015, at 9:29 am, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote: Can you explain your use case a

Re: Cache

Trying to evaluate the performance of queries with and without cache On 18-Aug-2015, at 11:30 am, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:23 PM, naga sharathrayapati sharathrayap...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to clear the cache through query? I need this

Re: Cache

I will go with {!cache=false}. Can we specify facet method in json nested faceting query? On 19-Aug-2015, at 7:07 pm, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Nagasharath sharathrayap...@gmail.com wrote: Trying to evaluate the performance of queries

Re: joins

I exactly have the same requirement On 13-Aug-2015, at 2:12 pm, Kiran Sai Veerubhotla sai.sq...@gmail.com wrote: does solr support joins? we have a use case where two collections have to be joined and the join has to be on the faceted results of the two collections. is this possible?

Re: Indexed stored

If I just want faceting(no search) can I set stored='false' and docValues='true' with indexed='true' On 13-Aug-2015, at 5:21 pm, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: DocValues, stored and indexed are all independent. So no, docValues is not an alternative to stored. Best,

Indexed stored

As stored indexed both default to true do we still need to specify in the schema as Indexed=true stored=true

Cross core join

I have a scenario(we are badly affected) where I have to join two cores of two different nodes. I knew that there is a jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/SOLR-7090) open in support of this, is there any alternate solution that I can work around until this gets

Certification

Is there a industry standard certification on solr?

Re: docValues

/DocValues? What kind of speedup? How often are you committing? Is there a speed difference after a while or on the first few queries? Details matter a lot for questions like this. Best, Erick On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Nagasharath sharathrayap...@gmail.com wrote: Good Sent from

Re: docValues

?) Without docValues, the first request would be slow (due to building the in-memory field cache entry), but after that it should be fast. -Yonik On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Nagasharath sharathrayap...@gmail.com wrote: I Have tested with docValue and without docValue on the test

Re: docValues

I am seeing a significant difference in the query time after using docValue. I am curious to know what's happening with 'docValue' included in the schema On 07-Aug-2015, at 4:31 pm, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: On 8/7/2015 11:47 AM, naga sharathrayapati wrote: JVM-Memory has gone

Re: docValues

, Nagasharath sharathrayap...@gmail.com wrote: I am seeing a significant difference in the query time after using docValue. I am curious to know what's happening with 'docValue' included in the schema On 07-Aug-2015, at 4:31 pm, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: On 8/7/2015 11:47

Re: Avoid re indexing

: 3m docs You could, of course, then split shard2. You could also split shard1 into three parts instead, if you preferred: shard1_0: 1m docs shard1_1: 1m docs shard1_2: 1m docs shard2: 3m docs Upayavira On Sun, Aug 2, 2015, at 12:25 AM, Nagasharath wrote: If my current shard

Re: Avoid re indexing

If my current shard is holding 3 million documents will the new subshard after splitting also be able to hold 3 million documents? If that is the case After shard splitting the sub shards should hold 6 million documents if a shard is split in to two. Am I right? On 01-Aug-2015, at 5:43 pm,

Re: serious JSON Facet bug

Is there a jira logged for this issue? Sent from my iPhone On 23-Jul-2015, at 11:09 pm, Nagasharath sharathrayap...@gmail.com wrote: I don't have this issue. I have tried with various json facet queries and my filter cache always come down to the 'minsize'( never exceeds configured

Re: serious JSON Facet bug

I don't have this issue. I have tried with various json facet queries and my filter cache always come down to the 'minsize'( never exceeds configured) with solr version 5.2.1, and all my queries are json nested faceted. On 23-Jul-2015, at 7:43 pm, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote: On

Query Performance

Any recommended tool to test the query performance would be of great help. Thanks

Re: Query Performance

, it will help you a lot ! Cheers 2015-07-21 16:49 GMT+01:00 Nagasharath sharathrayap...@gmail.com: Any recommended tool to test the query performance would be of great help. Thanks -- -- Benedetti Alessandro Visiting card - http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti

Re: Easy way to test index/query filters?

I like the idea. I am hearing nowadays about solrmeter, can't we accomplish this in solrmeter? Thanks, Naga On 18-Jul-2015, at 8:51 am, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't found one. I have a project plan for something just like this but it is one of many

Re: Delete Documents

Cool, just curious Thanks Eric Sent from my iPhone On 18-Jul-2015, at 10:23 am, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: No idea what you mean by chance of these deleted docs getting re-indexed. Solr shouldn't be doing this by itself. Certainly if your indexing process sends them in