RE: Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic Updates

2018-11-20 Thread Rajeswari Kolluri
Updates On 11/20/2018 9:07 PM, Rajeswari Kolluri wrote: > Schema version is 1.6 and Solr version is 7.5. > > While creating a document , I have provide the required information to field > " category". > > Now, I would like to update document for other set of f

RE: Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic Updates

2018-11-20 Thread Rajeswari Kolluri
present in the new index and the update fails. That's just the way atomic updates work. That said, if you _do_ store the cat field and still have this problem a JIRA would be in order. Frankly I do not know if setting docValues="true" and usedocValuesAsStored="true" will work

RE: Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic Updates

2018-11-20 Thread Rajeswari Kolluri
ic Updates On 11/19/2018 9:19 PM, Rajeswari Kolluri wrote: > Below is part of schema , entityid is my unique id field. Getting > exception missing required field for "category" during atomic updates. > stored="false" required="true" docValues="

RE: Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic Updates

2018-11-20 Thread Rajeswari Kolluri
red Fields for Atomic Updates What is the Router name for your collection? Is it "implicit" (You can know this from the "Overview" of you collection in the admin UI) ? If yes, what is the router.field parameter the collection was created with? Rahul On Mon, Nov 19, 2018

RE: Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic Updates

2018-11-19 Thread Rajeswari Kolluri
o:rahul196...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 9:33 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic Updates What’s your update query? You need to provide the unique id field of the document you are updating. Rahul On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:58 PM

Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic Updates

2018-11-19 Thread Rajeswari Kolluri
Hi, Using Solr 7.5.0. While performing atomic updates on a document on Solr Cloud using SolJ getting exceptions "Missing Required Field". Please let me know the solution, would not want to update the required fields during atomic updates. Thanks Rajeswari