I'm faceting with a two different query ranges while using addFacetQuery. I
wonder wether it's possible using SolrJ to extract the result of each query
range separately. Here's is my example:
addFacetQuery("price:[* TO 150]"); addFacetQuery("price:[151 TO 300]"); etc.
addFacetQuery("date:[* TO NOW
I'm faceting with a query range (with addFacetQuery) and setting mincount to
10 (with setFacetMinCount(10)), but Solr is not respecting this mincount;
it's still giving me all responses, even those having less than 10 retrieved
documents.
I'm wondering wether there's another way to define the minc
I noticed that, Yonik, but I couldnt figure out how to preserve the
"correct" order produced by Solr. Do you have any idea how to preserve it?
Thanks.
2010/3/10 Yonik Seeley
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Steve Radhouani
> wrote:
> > Thanks Erik. That's what
lr isn't going to be guaranteed.
>
>Erik
>
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:37 AM, Steve Radhouani wrote:
>
> Using Solrj, I would like to sort the response of a range query based on
>> some specific labels. For instance, using the query:
>>
>> facet=true
>>
Using Solrj, I would like to sort the response of a range query based on
some specific labels. For instance, using the query:
facet=true
&facet.query={!key= Less than 100}[* TO 99]
&facet.query={!key=100 - 200}[100 TO 200]
&facet.query={!key=200 +}[201 TO *]
I would like to display the response i
M
>
>
>
> http://www.webtide.com/choose/jetty.jsp
>
> >> > - Original Message -
> >> > From: "Steve Radhouani"
> >> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, 16 February, 2010 12:38:04 PM
> >> > Subject:
in the Schema browser, you can specify the Top X Terms you want to display.
Here's what you have on the browser: *Docs: * xxx
*Distinct: *
Top Terms
Thus, you can get the frequency of a given word, even though it's not the
most elegant solution.
2010/2/17 michaelnazaruk
>
> Schema browser
Using the "Schema Browser" of the Solr interface or Luke you can get the
frequency of a word in a specific field, but I don't know how to get it in
the entire index. A "dirty" solution would be to create a new field and copy
in it all your existing fields (), and then search the frequency of a give
t it
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Radhouani"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010 7:24:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Jetty: A Comparative Analysis?
>
> Thanks Ron. Actually, I'm developing a Web search e
;ve had successful deployments on both.
>
> Any difference in performance is far outweighed by ease of setup/support
> that you personally find in each.
>
> There is far more "knowledge" around Tomcat, but Jetty is more lightweight
> and real easy to embed.
>
> Ron
Hi there,
Is there any analysis out there that may help to choose between Tomcat and
Jetty to deploy Solr? I wonder wether there's a significant difference
between them in terms of performance.
Any advice would be much appreciated,
-Steve
Hi there,
Can the option be used by the DisMaxRequestHandler?
Thanks,
-Steve
12 matches
Mail list logo
