Thank you all

2012-02-08 Thread Tim Hibbs
nvironments, it has so much potential. You all have shown the collective knowledge and cooperation it takes to bring that potential to fruition. I wish I'd been able to pick up on the right details of the toolset to be able to make this work. Best of luck to you all! Tim Hibbs On 2/7/201

Missing search result...

2012-02-07 Thread Tim Hibbs
word "sale" in a indexed field. The indexed field containing that single occurrence is named "UrlContent". schema.xml UrlContent is defined as: Copyfields are as follows: Thanks, Tim Hibbs

Fwd: RE: Why are copyFields necessary here?

2012-01-27 Thread Tim Hibbs
quired="false" multiValued="true"/> > NOTES: > - text_en_splitting hasn't been changed from the value defined in the > example schema.xml with the 3.5.0 distribution... > - text exists as such in the > file... > - field "text" is defined as: > stored="false" multiValued="true"/> > - copyFields are: > > > > > - If it's relevant, I'm boosting Keywords^2.5, Title^2.0, TOC^2.0, and > Overview^1.5 when the index is built. > Thanks, > Tim Hibbs

RE: Why are copyFields necessary here?

2012-01-27 Thread Tim Hibbs
quired="false" multiValued="true"/> > NOTES: > - text_en_splitting hasn't been changed from the value defined in the > example schema.xml with the 3.5.0 distribution... > - text exists as such in the > file... > - field "text" is defined as: > stored="false" multiValued="true"/> > - copyFields are: > > > > > - If it's relevant, I'm boosting Keywords^2.5, Title^2.0, TOC^2.0, and > Overview^1.5 when the index is built. > Thanks, > Tim Hibbs

Why are copyFields necessary here?

2012-01-27 Thread Tim Hibbs
relevant, I'm boosting Keywords^2.5, Title^2.0, TOC^2.0, and Overview^1.5 when the index is built. Thanks, Tim Hibbs

RE: Highlighting more than 1 term

2012-01-24 Thread Tim Hibbs
pening to more than one term in the fields for which I desired highlighting. Note that I used the "stock" fieldtype definitions supplied with solr. Once I changed the field type back to "text" and re-indexed again, highlighting multiple terms in the same field was re-enabl

RE: Highlighting more than 1 term

2012-01-18 Thread Tim Hibbs
Aro, thanks for your interest and response. I'm using the "stock" definition in the supplied config.xml, as follows: When viewing the debug output of the results, I have: 2.097683 = (MATCH) sum of: 1.072057 = (MATCH) weight(text:schedul in 1595), product of: 0.75786966

Highlighting more than 1 term

2012-01-18 Thread Tim Hibbs
Hello, I have so far been unable to get more than one term highlighted for a given field. In the example below, I expected (and want) both the words "Scheduling" and "Pickup" to be surrounded with , but only one word is ever highlighted. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Points of in