me
> with each query log.
>
> Security:
> suggest you to go through this wiki
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity
>
> *Thanks,*
> *Rajesh,*
> *(mobile) : 8328789519.*
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Vishal Swaroop
> wrote:
>
> > It
suggest you to go through this wiki
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity
>
> *Thanks,*
> *Rajesh,*
> *(mobile) : 8328789519.*
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Vishal Swaroop
> wrote:
>
> > It will be great if you can provide your valuable inputs on strat
It will be great if you can provide your valuable inputs on strategy for
logging & security...
Thanks a lot in advance...
Logging :
- Is there a way to implement logging for each cores separately.
- What will be the best strategy to log every query details (like source
IP, search query, etc.
5.x Solr world deprecates using a war
> file. It's still actually produced, but Solr is moving towards start
> scripts instead. This is something new to get used to. See:
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/WhyNoWar
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:51 PM,
#x27;d explore is whether you can denormlized your way
> out of the need to join. Or whether you can use block joins instead.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Vishal Swaroop
> wrote:
> > Currently, we have SOLR configured on single linux server (24
Currently, we have SOLR configured on single linux server (24 GB physical
memory) with multiple cores.
We are using SOLR joins (https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join) across cores on
this single server.
But, as data will grow to ~2 billion we need to assess whether we’ll need
to run SolrCloud as "In a
esult
> > enough to matter which is application-specific.
> >
> > Best,
> > Erick
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Vishal Swaroop
> wrote:
> >> Also 10481.5711458735456*79* indexes to 10481.571145873546 using double
> >> >
Also 10481.5711458735456*79* indexes to 10481.571145873546 using double
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Vishal Swaroop
wrote:
> Thanks Erick... I can ignore the trailing zeros
>
> I am indexing data from Vertica database... Though *double *is very close
> but it SOLR indexes 14
ed" portion and will be returned if you specify
> the field in your "fl" list. I'm assuming here that you're looking at
> the actual indexed terms, and don't really understand why the trailing
> zeros are important
>
> Do not use strings.
>
> Bes
indexes to 277.67783
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> "double" (solr.TrieDoubleField) gives more precision
>
> See:
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/5_1_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/schema/TrieDoubleField.html
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
Please suggest which numeric field type to use so that I can get complete
value.
e.g value in database is : 194.846189733028000
If I index it as float SOLR indexes it as 194.84619 where as I need
complete value i.e 194.846189733028000
I will also be doing range query on this field.
Regards
Need your valuable inputs...
I am indexing data from database (one table) which is in this example
format :
id name value
1 Joe 102724904
2 Joe 100996643
- id is primary/ unique key
- there can be same "name" but different "value"
- If I try "name" as unique key then SOLR removes duplicate and in
We have item_name indexed as text edge_ngram which returns like results...
Please suggest what will be the best approach (like "string" index (in
addition to "...edge_ngram"... or using copyField...) to search ALSO for
exact matches?
e.g. url should return item_name as "abc" entries only... I tri
Thanks... Yes that is option we will go forward with.
On Apr 20, 2015 10:52 AM, "Kaushik" wrote:
> Have you tried select as id, name, age ?
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Vishal Swaroop
> wrote:
>
> > Just wondering if there is a way to generate uuid/ id i
Just wondering if there is a way to generate uuid/ id in data-config
without using combination of fields in query...
data-config.xml
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Vishal Swaroop
wrote:
> Thanks Kaushik & Erick..
>
> Though I can populate uuid by using combination of fi
wrote:
> > You seem to have defined the field, but not populating it in the query.
> Use
> > a combination of fields to come up with a unique id that can be assigned
> to
> > uuid. Does that make sense?
> >
> > Kaushik
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015
How to generate uuid/ id (maybe in data-config.xml...) for table which do
not have any primary key.
Scenario :
Using DIH I need to import data from database but table does not have any
primary key
I do have uuid defined in schema.xml and is
uuid
data-config.xml
Error : Document is missi
suggest to use Solr as it is, because after few more release solr will
> > not
> > >> be able to run using application server.
> > >>
> > >> So its good to use it as it is (without application server) when you
> are
> > >> redesigning the stru
Hi,
We are planning to configure new linux server for latest SOLR release i.e.
5.0.0
Please suggest which Tomcat version will be best compatible with SOLR5...
latest Tomcat release is 8.0
Thanks
15 at 4:43 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> On 27 February 2015 at 16:11, Vishal Swaroop wrote:
> > I am able to index XML with same "name" element but in different XPATH by
> > using XPathEntityProcessor "forEach" (e.g. below)
> >
> > Just wonderi
Hi,
I am able to index XML with same "name" element but in different XPATH by
using XPathEntityProcessor "forEach" (e.g. below)
Just wondering if there is better way to handle this xml format.
a) Is there any better way to handle this scenario as xml file will have
multiple sub-menu attributes (
s, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 25 February 2015 at 13:26, Vishal Swaroop wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wondering if there is a way to handle this use-case in SOLR without
> > manually editing Schema.xml.
>
Hi,
Just wondering if there is a way to handle this use-case in SOLR without
manually editing Schema.xml.
Scenario :
We have xml data with some elements/ attributes which we plan to index.
As we move forward there can be addition of xml elements.
Is there a way to handle this with out manually a
Please suggest on how to get the distinct count for a field (name).
Summary : I have data indexed in the following format
category name value
Cat1 A 1
Cat1 A 2
Cat1 B 3
Cat1 B 4
I tried getting the distinct "name" count... but it returns 4 records
instaed of 2 (i.e. A, B)
http://localhost:8081/so
We noticed that SOLR/ Tomcat also needs a restart... is it same for you
also ?
Regards
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Nitin Solanki wrote:
> Ok. Thanx
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
>
> > On 22 January 2015 at 11:23, Nitin Solanki wrote:
> > > I *indexed* *2GB* o
E_12"
**
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Cabrerizo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure, but I think that the PatternReplaceFilterFactory or
> the PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory could help you deleting those
> characters.
>
> Regards.
&
I am trying to implement type-ahead suggestion for single field which
should ignore whitesapce, underscore or special characters in autosuggest.
It works as suggested by Alex using KeywordTokenizerFactory but how to
ignore whitesapce, underscore...
Example itemName data can be :
"ABC E12" : if us
have issues.
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 20 January 2015 at 23:08, Vishal Swaroop wrote:
> > Thanks for the response..
> > a) I am trying to make it non-case-sensitive... ite
ywordTokenizer and
> LowerCaseFilter?
>
> Also, normally we do not use NGRam filter on both Index and Query.
> That just makes things to match on common prefixes instead of matching
> what you are searching for to a prefix of original word.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
> ---
Hi,
May be this is basic but I am trying to understand which Tokenizer and
Filter to use. I followed some examples as mentioned in solr wiki but
type-ahead does not show expected suggestions.
Example itemName data can be :
- "ABC12DE" : It does not work as soon as I type 1.. i.e. ABC1
- "ABC_12DE
Hi,
I am exploring faceting in SOLR in collection1 example Faceting fields are
defined in solrconfig.xml under browse request handler which is used in
in-built "VelocityResponseWriter"
...
on
cat
I think it is not at all mandatory to define facet fields in
solrconfig.xml, right ?
> but writing custom components was easier in other framworks (you need to
> take this statement with grain of salt: it was specific to our situation),
> but that was one year ago...
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Vishal Swaroop
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Roman... I wil
> > *) http://projectblacklight.org/
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex.
> >
> > Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
> >
> >
> > On 6 January 2015 at 16:35, Vishal Swaroop wrote:
> > > I am new to SOLR and was
rces newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 6 January 2015 at 16:35, Vishal Swaroop wrote:
> > I am new to SOLR and was able to configure, run samples as well as able
> to
> > index data using DIH (from database).
> >
> > Just wondering if there are open source framework to query and
> > display/visualize.
> >
> > Regards
>
I am new to SOLR and was able to configure, run samples as well as able to
index data using DIH (from database).
Just wondering if there are open source framework to query and
display/visualize.
Regards
35 matches
Mail list logo
