I think I may have solved my problem. Not 100% certain what the solution was
because I've been trying so many things, but in the end what I did was
revisit this article and re-step my configuration.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/04/08/solr-powered-isfdb-part-9/
I believe what the
I have the same exact problem as the OP and can't seem to figure out why it's
not working.
The indexed field to derive suggestions from is name_auto which is of type
text_general in schema.xml. I made some copyFields to have certain fields
be put into name_auto. I can see that name_auto is
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, all are indexed=true (name_auto and the copyField items).
Here are the snippets from schema.xml (didn't want to post the whole thing
because the following is what I've changed/added)
field name=name_auto type=text_general indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true
but, I'm
still trying to understand how to configure solr to do hierarchical
faceting.
Thanks,
kmf
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/hierarchical-faceting-SOLR-792-confused-on-config-tp2556394p2561445.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
create a TemplateTransformer to produce the indexed data? Do I have to do
something special within schema.xml and/or solrconfig.xml?
Once I figure out the correct config setup, I assume it's simply a matter of
creating the correct solr query like he describes in the video?
Thanks,
kmf
--
View
condition to group in
the index, if that makes sense? Assuming that's what I need to do.
Or am I totally wrong in thinking I would handle this in the index?
Thanks,
kmf
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Grouping-not-sure-where-to-handle-solr-or-outside
I'm new to solr (and indexing in general) and am having a hard time making
the transition from rdbms to indexing in terms of the DIH/data-config.xml
file. I've successfully created a working index (so far) for the simple
queries in my db, but I'm struggling to add a more complex query. When I
I'm not understanding this response. My main table does have a one to many
relationship with the other tables. What should I be anticipating/wanting
for each document if I want to return to the user the values while allowing
them to search on the other terms?
Thanks.
--
View this message in
