It is a single node. I am trying to find out if the performance can be
referenced.
Regarding information on Solr with RankingAlgorithm, you can find all
the information here:
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
On RankingAlgorithm:
http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
Regards,
- NN
On 5/27/2012 4:50
I don't recall anyone being able to get acceptable performance with a
single index that large with solr/lucene. The conventional wisdom is
that parallel searching across cores (or shards in SolrCloud) is the
best way to handle index sizes in the illions. So its of great
interest how you did.
Hi!
I am very excited to announce the availability of Solr 3.6 with
RankingAlgorithm 1.4.2.
This NRT supports now works with both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene. The
insert/update performance should be about 5000 docs in about 490 ms with
the MbArtists Index.
RankingAlgorithm 1.4.2 has
Hi,
Have you tested this with a billion documents?
Darren
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 07:24 -0700, Nagendra Nagarajayya wrote:
Hi!
I am very excited to announce the availability of Solr 3.6 with
RankingAlgorithm 1.4.2.
This NRT supports now works with both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene. The
Actually, RankingAlgorithm 1.4.2 has been scaled to more than 2 billion
docs. With RankingAlgorithm 1.4.3, using the parameters
age=latestdocs=number feature, you can retrieve the NRT inserted
documents in milliseconds from such a huge index improving query and
faceting performance and using
My company is thinking to buy search algorithm from famous expert in
searching Petr Hejl - http://www.milionovastranka.net/
but i see RankingAlgorithm has fantastic results too and looking at its
reference page it even powers sites like oracle.com and ebay.com.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote:
but i see RankingAlgorithm has fantastic results too and looking at its
reference page it even powers sites like oracle.com and ebay.com.
What reference page are you referring to?
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
What reference page are you referring to?
http://tgels.com/wiki/en/Sites_using/downloaded_RankingAlgorithm_or_Solr-RA
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote:
What reference page are you referring to?
http://tgels.com/wiki/en/Sites_using/downloaded_RankingAlgorithm_or_Solr-RA
Ah, ok sites using/downloaded
So someone with a .oracle email / domain checked it out - that
certainly
Solr with RankingAlgorithm is free (for test/development/production).
Here is the license page
http://tgels.com/docs/SoftwareLicenseAgreement.txt.
RankingAlgorithm is also free ( for test/development/production).
Regards,
- NN
On 5/27/2012 8:57 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
My company is thinking
I think people on this list would be more interested in your approach to
scaling 2 billion documents than modifying solr/lucene scoring (which is
already top notch). So given that, can you share any references or
otherwise substantiate good performance with 2 billion documents?
Thanks.
On Sun,
Let me see if I can reference the performance with RankingAlgorithm.
Regards,
Nagendra Nagarajayya
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
On 5/27/2012 10:06 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
I think people on this list would be more interested in your approach to
scaling 2
yes, I am also interested in good performance with 2 billion docs. how
many search nodes do you use? what's the average response time and qps
?
another question: where can I find related paper or resources of your
algorithm which explains the algorithm in detail? why it's better than
google
13 matches
Mail list logo
