: With an implicit collection, is it legal to index the same document
: (same unique ID) in 2 different shards? I know, it kind of defeats the
: purpose of having a unique ID...
Each doc (defined by uniqueKey) must exist in one and only one shard ...
when this constraint is violated, you'll star
On 10 December 2014 at 10:53, Damien Dykman wrote:
> The facets do take into
> account the duplicate nature but the number of results varies, for
> instance depending on parameter row=xx.
The facets take deleted but not yet expunged (merged segment)
documents into account. One of the limitations
Hi all,
With an implicit collection, is it legal to index the same document
(same unique ID) in 2 different shards? I know, it kind of defeats the
purpose of having a unique ID...
The reason I'm doing this, is because I want to "move" a single document
from 1 shard to an other. During the transit
