We do both #2 and #4 from the Wiki page. If the schemas have a lot of
overlap and you don't foresee the need to scale to multiple machines (either
due to index size or amount of traffic), it may be best to put all the data
in a single index with different type fields (#4); this certainly minimizes
: I found this thread in the archive...
:
: I'm responsible for a number of ruby on rails websites, all of which need
: search. Solr seems to have everything I need, but I am wondering what's the
: best way to maintain multiple indexes?
:
: Multiple Solr instances on different ports?
having mul
That wiki page is purely an idea proposal at this time, not a
feature of Solr (yet or perhaps ever).
Erik
I found this thread in the archive...
I'm responsible for a number of ruby on rails websites, all of which
need search. Solr seems to have everything I need, but I am
wonde
that document I
changed solrconfig.xml. But I can't visible any partitioned folder
other
than default one. I need help on index partitioning.give some
suggestion to
this.
Thanks in advance
-Santhanaraj
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Index-parti
some suggestion to
this.
Thanks in advance
-Santhanaraj
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Index-partioning-tp19249441p19249441.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
