Re: Issue with empty strings not being indexed/stored?

2016-11-15 Thread Chris Hostetter
You'll have to give us more details on what exactly you are doing to reproduce the problem you are seeing, and more detals on how exactly you upgraded (and what version you upgraded from) ... https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists When i launch 6.3.0 using "bin/solr -e techproducts

Issue with empty strings not being indexed/stored?

2016-11-15 Thread Michael Joyner
Hello all, We've been indexing documents with empty strings for some fields. After our latest round of Solr/SolrJ updates to 6.3.0 we have discovered that fields with empty strings are no longer being stored, effectively storing documents with those fields as being NULL/NOT-PRESENT instead of

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
Correct. In fact, faceting pulls its values normally from the indexed terms anyway. It completely ignores stored. Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ On 13 August 2015 at 19:49, Nagasharath wrote: > If I just want faceting(no search) c

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread Nagasharath
If I just want faceting(no search) can I set stored='false' and docValues='true' with indexed='true' > On 13-Aug-2015, at 5:21 pm, Erick Erickson wrote: > > DocValues, stored and indexed are all independent. > So no, docValues is not an alternative to stored. > > Best, > Erick > > On Thu, Au

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread Erick Erickson
DocValues, stored and indexed are all independent. So no, docValues is not an alternative to stored. Best, Erick On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:51 PM, naga sharathrayapati wrote: > Do we need to specify stored='true' even when we specify docValues='true' > in the schema > > is docValues not the alter

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread naga sharathrayapati
Do we need to specify stored='true' even when we specify docValues='true' in the schema is docValues not the alternate of stored? On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 8/13/2015 9:07 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > No. But how do they default to "true"? In the fieldType? Which

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 8/13/2015 9:07 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > No. But how do they default to "true"? In the fieldType? Which will be > potentially different for different fieldTypes, so as a matter of style I > prefer > to list them in the field definition. But that's not necessary. I previously looked at the co

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread Edward Ribeiro
My two cents, If anything else, declaring them as indexed="true" and stored="true" helps to auto document the schema and make its options explicit. Best, Eddie On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > No. But how do they default to "true"? In the fieldType? Which will be > po

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread naga sharathrayapati
what if i do something like this in the schema will the filed name be stored? or not stored? as i have not specified in the schema as stored='true'/'false'. On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > No. But how do they default to "true"? In the fieldType? Which will be > poten

Re: Indexed & stored

2015-08-13 Thread Erick Erickson
No. But how do they default to "true"? In the fieldType? Which will be potentially different for different fieldTypes, so as a matter of style I prefer to list them in the field definition. But that's not necessary. Best, Erick On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Nagasharath wrote: > As stored & in

Indexed & stored

2015-08-12 Thread Nagasharath
As stored & indexed both default to "true" do we still need to specify in the schema as Indexed="true" & stored="true"