Yes, I wanted to get rid of merge step. But looks like merge is not that
cumbersome either. Thanks Mikhail and Erick for pointers, that helped.
Jaikit
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 8:24 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
You certainly can't do this into a single directory, there would be
zi
You certainly can't do this into a single directory, there would be
zillions of name conflicts.
I believe I saw Uwe make a comment on the Lucene list about using
MultiReaders and
keeping the sub-indexes in different directories, but that's
lower-level than Solr has access to
Plus, you'd have to co
This solution will merge the index as well. I want to find out if merge is
"required" before loading indexes onto Solr ? If that is possible than I can
just point solrconfig.xml to directory where I have all the shards.
Jaikit
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:11 AM, Mikhail Khludnev
wro
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Jaikit Savla <
jaikit.sa...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Now to load this index, I am currently using Lucene IndexMergeTool to
> merge all the shards into one giant index. My question is, is there a way
> to load shared index without merging into one giant index on
Folks,
I have generated multiple (count of 100) sharded Lucene indexes on Hadoop and
they are of format. The total indexed data (sum of all the index-*) is of size
500GB and hence the number of shards.drwxr-x--- 2 index-66drwxr-x--- 2
index-68drwxr-x--- 2 index-9
and each index directory