Re: Optimize and replication: some questions battery.

2014-02-06 Thread Luis Cappa Banda
Hi Toke! Thanks for answering. That's it: I talk about index corruption just to prevent, not because I have already noticed it. During some tests in the past I checked that a mergeFactor of 2 improves more than a little bit search speed instead common merge factors such as 10, for example. Of cour

Re: Optimize and replication: some questions battery.

2014-02-06 Thread Toke Eskildsen
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:22 +0100, Luis Cappa Banda wrote: > I knew some performance tips to improve search and I configured a very > low merge factor (2) to boost search > operations instead of indexation ones. That would give you a small search speed increase and a huge penalty on indexing speed

Re: Optimize and replication: some questions battery.

2014-02-06 Thread Luis Cappa Banda
Hi Chris, Thank you very much for your response! It was very instructive. I knew some performance tips to improve search and I configured a very low merge factor (2) to boost search operations instead of indexation ones. I haven't got a deep knowledge of internal Lucene behavior in this case, but

Re: Optimize and replication: some questions battery.

2014-02-05 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I've got an scenario where I index very frequently on master servers and : replicate to slave servers with one minute polling. Master indexes are : growing fast and I would like to optimize indexes to improve search : queries. However... For a scenerio where your index is changing that rapidly,

Optimize and replication: some questions battery.

2014-02-05 Thread Luis Cappa Banda
Hello! I've got an scenario where I index very frequently on master servers and replicate to slave servers with one minute polling. Master indexes are growing fast and I would like to optimize indexes to improve search queries. However... 1. During an optimize operation, can master servers index