Don't do this. Many bits of sharding assume that a uniqueKey
exists on one and only one shard. Document counts may be
off. Faceting may be off. Etc.
Why do you want to duplicate records across shards? What
benefit is this providing?
This feels like an XY problem...
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 10,
to get this
done, other than grouping common objects to yet another shard?Thanks again,Eric.
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:15:44 -0600
Subject: Re: Distributed Searching + unique Ids
From: erickerick...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Don't do this. Many bits of sharding assume
: Re: Distributed Searching + unique Ids
Don't do this. Many bits of sharding assume that a uniqueKey
exists on one and only one shard. Document counts may be
off. Faceting may be off. Etc.
Why do you want to duplicate records across shards? What
benefit is this providing?
This feels like an XY
, but that would only work if certain
common objects are duplicated across shards.Can you think of another way to
get this done, other than grouping common objects to yet another shard?Thanks
again,Eric.
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:15:44 -0600
Subject: Re: Distributed Searching + unique Ids
From
, there are only 14 results, and it still reports 21 entries for
cat:electronics.
Is this a known bug?
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 7:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Distributed Searching + unique Ids
, there are only 14 results, and it still reports 21 entries for
cat:electronics.
Is this a known bug?
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 7:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Distributed Searching + unique Ids
