Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

2017-08-03 Thread Erick Erickson
Atita: Thanks for that update. I've opened SOLR-11188 to track this, please add any details to that JIRA that you can, in particular what bit of code you've identified as the problem. Also, do you have any document you can share that would cause this? I'm wondering if it's sensitive to the

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

2017-08-03 Thread Atita Arora
Hi All , Just thought of giving quick update on this. So we were able to *knock down this issue by using jvisualvm* which comes with java . So , we enabled monitoring through jmx and the CPU profiling showed (as attached in one of my previous emails) *Highlighting taking maximum processing.*

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

2017-07-28 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 7/27/2017 1:30 AM, Atita Arora wrote: > What OS is Solr running on? I'm only asking because some additional > information I'm after has different gathering methods depending on OS. > Other questions: > > /*OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (25.141-b16) for linux-amd64 JRE > (1.8.0_141-b16), built on

RE: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

2017-07-27 Thread Markus Jelsma
July 2017 9:30 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3 > > Hi Shawn , > > Thank you for the pointers , here is the information : > > > What OS is Solr running on?  Im only asking because some additi

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

2017-07-27 Thread Atita Arora
Hi Shawn , Thank you for the pointers , here is the information : What OS is Solr running on? I'm only asking because some additional information I'm after has different gathering methods depending on OS. Other questions: *OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (25.141-b16) for linux-amd64 JRE

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

2017-07-26 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 7/26/2017 1:49 AM, Atita Arora wrote: > We did our functional and load testing on these boxes , however when we > released it to production along with the same application (using SolrJ to > query Solr) , we ran into severe CPU issues. > Just to add we're on Master - Slave where master has index