Dear Upayvira,
Thank you very much.
I think probably in long-term the fluctuation of changing score becomes
really small. Probably I can reduce that with considering percentage
instead of filtering by raw score. (however it is still possible that
percentage changes during a period of time)
Hello Upayavira - Indeed, it works, except ... insert-counter-arguments. It
doesn't work after all :)
Markus
-Original message-
From:Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday 3rd February 2015 21:38
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: MoreLikeThis filter by score threshold
- Indeed, it works, except ... insert-counter-arguments.
It doesn't work after all :)
Markus
-Original message-
From:Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday 3rd February 2015 21:38
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: MoreLikeThis filter by score threshold
I've seen
3rd February 2015 21:02
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: MoreLikeThis filter by score threshold
Dear Markus,
Hi,
Thank you very much for your response. I did check the reason why it is not
recommended to filter by score in search query. But I think it is
reasonable to filter
Hi - sure you can, using the frange parser as a filter:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-FunctionRangeQueryParser
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_10_3/solr-core/org/apache/solr/search/FunctionRangeQParserPlugin.html
But this is very much not
Dear Markus,
Hi,
Thank you very much for your response. I did check the reason why it is not
recommended to filter by score in search query. But I think it is
reasonable to filter by score in case of finding similar documents. I know
in both of them (simple search query and mlt query) vsm of
I've seen this done (encouraged against it, but didn't win). It works.
Except, sometimes things change in the index, and the scores change
subtly. We get complaints that documents that previously were above the
threshold now aren't, and visa-versa. I try to explain that the score
has no meaning
