Hi Hoss.
Yes, it's the tricky part when re-structuring configs...
One possible solution is, when you create a new schema, you offer a
conversion tool... Other is to define a version on the config and
depending on the version, the expected structure will be different.
I'm sure you know this all,
: conversion tool... Other is to define a version on the config and
: depending on the version, the expected structure will be different.
FYI: schema.xml does have this ... it's one of hte ,schema attributes.
we've only ever reved it once when multiValue fields were added because we
wanted to
: filter factory=solr.ReflectionFilterFactory class=...CJKTokenFilter /
:
: I think this way, the config terms are a bit clearer... What do you think?
in general, do i think it would be better if the filter and tokenizer
declarations used factory as the attribute instead of class? ...yes.
So i
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: add CJKTokenizer to solr
I'm sorry. Because it was not possible to append it,
it sends it again.
I got the error below after adding CJKTokenizer to schema.xml. I
checked the constructor of CJKTokenizer, it requires a Reader parameter,
I guess that's
Hi Hoss.
I've done a few tests using reflection to instantiate a simple object and
the results will vary a lot depending on the JVM. As the JVM optimizes code
as it is executed it will vary depending on the usage, but I think we have
something to consider:
If done 1,000 samples (5 clean X loop
Sorry I've confused things a bit... The thread safeness have to be
considered only on the Tokenizers, not on the factories. So are the
Tokenizers thread safe?
Regards,
Daniel
On 22/6/07 11:36, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hoss.
I've done a few tests using reflection to
: Friday, June 22, 2007 12:43:50 PM
Subject: Re: add CJKTokenizer to solr
Sorry I've confused things a bit... The thread safeness have to be
considered only on the Tokenizers, not on the factories. So are the
Tokenizers thread safe?
Regards,
Daniel
On 22/6/07 11:36, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL
: Sorry I've confused things a bit... The thread safeness have to be
: considered only on the Tokenizers, not on the factories. So are the
: Tokenizers thread safe?
nope ... they are constructed using Readers and mainting state about the
text they are processing ... the only api is a next()
On 21-Jun-07, at 10:22 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
like i said though: i'm in favore of factories like this ... i just
don't
think we should do anything to hide their use and make refering to
Tokenizer or TOkenFilter class names directly use reflection magicly.
What would be the best way
I got the error below after adding CJKTokenizer to schema.xml. I
checked the constructor of CJKTokenizer, it requires a Reader parameter,
I guess that's why I get this error, I searched the email archive, it
seems working for other users. Does anyone know what is the problem?
I'm sorry. Because it was not possible to append it,
it sends it again.
I got the error below after adding CJKTokenizer to schema.xml. I
checked the constructor of CJKTokenizer, it requires a Reader parameter,
I guess that's why I get this error, I searched the email archive, it
seems
Thank you all, it's works now:).
2007/1/30, James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
he now is ok.
--
regards
jl
On Jan 29, 2007, at 1:08 AM, zha jimmy wrote:
hi, all
I am try to config solr to support chinese tokenize。
I saw the tips in schema.xml:
!-- One can also specify an existing Analyzer class that has a
default constructor via the class attribute on the analyzer
element
: I realized that solr do not have the CJK package ,but how can I
: add it
: in?
:
: You need to add the analyzers JAR from Lucene's contrib area to your
: Solr application, under WEB-INF/lib. You can get that JAR from the
: latest Lucene release distribution.
it's acctually eazier then
he now is ok.
--
regards
jl
15 matches
Mail list logo
