On May 6, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times -
according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has
Thanks Steve and Yonik. This now makes sense. Updating the doc will be of
a big help.
With regards to deleting a copy-field, what I found is that if I have N
instances of the same copy-field, I have to issue N deletes to remove them
all. This behavior matches with the add and need to be kept.
Hi Steve,
It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times -
according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has
been used in the past to effectively boost terms in the source field.
The API isn’t symmetric here though: I’m guessing deleting a
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times -
according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has
been used in the past to effectively boost terms in the source field.
