Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Hey Gunaranjan, I have the same scenario as you. A lucene index is denormalized. It should not contain entity relationship. When I need to do something like you are doing, I group the related values in one field. Let's say we have 2 credit cards. the first has id 30459673 and taxes at 1.5%/month

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Paul Its not just about merging the fields or resource usage. If you look at the scenario below, the issue is that it mixes up my fields (shipping and billing address) for instance. I can't merge them and still keep the 'distinction' for search.Your case is a 'generalization' field.

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Thanks Much appreciate the guidance. I think I will go with the single field approach for now. Also will take a look at the URL below and come back if I have any ideas. Guna On Jan 25, 2009, at 12:49 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Gunaranjan Chandraraju

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Guna, it's really really normal to duplicate stuffs to be merged into a field. We do this all the time, for example to have a field "text-in-any- language" while a field "text-in-english" is also there and the queries boost matches in text-in-any-language less than text-in- english (if user

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Gunaranjan Chandraraju < chandrar...@apple.com> wrote: > Thanks > This sounds redundant to me - to store the fields separately and then > concat all of them to one copy field again. > Sometimes that may be the only way. For example, if you want to facet on some of

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Thanks This sounds redundant to me - to store the fields separately and then concat all of them to one copy field again. My XML is like this I am currently using XPATH or XSL to separate them into individual indexed fields like: address_state_1, address_type_1 etc. in SOLR. From what you

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

for searching you need to put them in a single field . use in schema.xml to achieve that On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Gunaranjan Chandraraju wrote: > I make this approach work with XPATH and XSL. However, this approach > creates multiple fields of like this > > address_state_1 > address_st

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

I make this approach work with XPATH and XSL. However, this approach creates multiple fields of like this address_state_1 address_state_2 ... address_state_10 and credit_card_1 credit_card_2 credit_card_3 How do I search for a credit_card.The query syntax does not seem to support wi

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Hi Fergus, XPathEntityprocessor can read multivalued fields easily eg ***change** In this case all address_street,address_state,address_type will be returned as s

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

nesting of an XPathEntityProcessor into another XPathEntityProcessor is possible only if a field in an xml is a filename/url . what is the purpose of nesting like this? is it because you have multiple addresses? the possible solutions are discussed elsewhere in this thread On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Hello, I am also a newbie and was wanting to do almost the exact same thing. I was planning on doing the equivalent of:- ***change**

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Yes Solr does. But DataImportHandler with the 1.3 release does not support it. However, you can use the trunk data import handler jar with Solr 1.3 if you do not feel comfortable using Solr 1.4 trunk. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Gunaranjan Chandraraju < chandrar...@apple.com> wrote: > > I t

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

I thought 1.3 supported dynamic fields in schema.xml? Guna On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:54 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Oops, one more gotcha. The dynamic field support is only in 1.4 trunk. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, Jan 2

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

I thought 1.3 supported dynamic fields in schema.xml? Guna On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:54 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Oops, one more gotcha. The dynamic field support is only in 1.4 trunk. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, Jan 2

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

Oops, one more gotcha. The dynamic field support is only in 1.4 trunk. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Gunaranjan Chandraraju < > chandrar...@apple.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I h

Re: How to make Relationships work for Multi-valued Index Fields?

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Gunaranjan Chandraraju < chandrar...@apple.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have setup my DIH to treat these as entities as below > > > > > baseDir="***" > fileName=".*xml" > rootEntity="false" >