On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:28 PM, anuvenk anuvenkat...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm using query time synonyms.
These don't currently work if the synonyms expand to more than one
option, and those options have a different number of words.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
I tried adding some city to state mappings in the synonyms file. I'm using
the dismax handler for phrase matching. So as when i add more more city
to state mappings, I end up with zero results for state based searches.
Eg: ca,california,los angeles
ca,california,san diego
A small addition to my earlier post. I wonder if its because of the 'mm'
param, which requires that until 3 words in search phrase, all the words
should be matched. If i alter this now, i'd get ir-relevant results for a
lot of popular 1, 2, 3 word search terms. How to solve for this?
anuvenk
Hi,
If index-time synonym expansion/indexing is used, then a large synonym file
means your index is going to be bigger.
If query-time synonym expansion is used, then your queries are going to be
larger (i.e. more ORs, thus a bit slower).
How much, it really depends on your specific synonyms,
I'm using query time synonyms. I have more fields in my index though. This is
just an example or sample of data from my index. Yes, we don't have millions
of documents. Could be around 300,000 and might increase in future. The
reason i'm using query time synonyms is because of the nature of my
Hello,
300K is a pretty small index. I wouldn't worry about the number of synonyms
unless you are turning a single term into dozens of ORed terms.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: anuvenk anuvenkat...@hotmail.com
To:
