Re: solr-user-subscribe

If you _are_ using SolrCloud, you can use the collections API SPLITSHARD command. > On Oct 25, 2019, at 7:37 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 10/24/2019 11:19 PM, Hafiz Muhammad Shafiq wrote: >> HI, >> I am using Solr 6.x version for search purposes. Now data has been >> increased into one shard.

Re: solr-user-subscribe

On 10/24/2019 11:19 PM, Hafiz Muhammad Shafiq wrote: HI, I am using Solr 6.x version for search purposes. Now data has been increased into one shard. I have to create some additional shards and also have to balance base on number of documents. According to my search, solr does not provide rebalan

Re: solr-user-subscribe

HI, I am using Solr 6.x version for search purposes. Now data has been increased into one shard. I have to create some additional shards and also have to balance base on number of documents. According to my search, solr does not provide rebalance API. Is it correct ? How can I do my job. On Fri, O

Re: solr-user-unsubscribe

Follow the instructions here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc. You must use the _exact_ same e-mail as you used to subscribe. If the initial try doesn't work and following the suggestions at the "problems" link doesn't work for you, let us know. But note you need

Re: solr-user-subscribe

I added a reply to the discussion. Please accept. On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Naohiko Uramoto [via Lucene] < ml+s472066n4346101...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > solr-user-subscribe <[hidden email] > > > > -- > Naohiko Uramoto > > > --

Re: solr-user-subscribe

Please follow the instructions here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc. You must use the _exact_ same e-mail as you used to subscribe. If the initial try doesn't work and following the suggestions at the "problems" link doesn't work for you, let us know. But note you

Re: solr-user-subscribe

unsubscribe On Friday, July 14, 2017, Naohiko Uramoto wrote: > solr-user-subscribe > > > -- > Naohiko Uramoto >

Re: solr-user-unsubscribe

Please follow the instructions here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc. You must use the _exact_ same e-mail as you used to subscribe. If the initial try doesn't work and following the suggestions at the "problems" link doesn't work for you, let us know. But note you n

Re: solr-user-unsubscribe

Please follow the instructions here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc. You must use the _exact_ same e-mail as you used to subscribe. If the initial try doesn't work and following the suggestions at the "problems" link doesn't work for you, let us know. But note you n

Re: solr-user-unsubscribe

It's all an automated process, Please follow the "unsubscribe" instructions here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc You must use the _exact_ e-mail address you used to subscribe with. the "Problems" link provides additional information. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:55 AM

Re: solr-user-unsubscribe

Come on dude. Just look at instructions. Have a little respect. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Rowe, William - 1180 - MITLL < william.r...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > solr-user-unsubscribe > > >

RE: solr-user-unsubscribe

solr-user-unsubscribe smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: solr-user-unsubscribe

Please follow the instructions here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/resources.html. Be sure to use the exact same e-mail you used to subscribe. Best, Erick On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Stefan Meise - SONIC Performance Support wrote: >

Re: solr user

On 3 June 2014 11:22, Manoj V wrote: > I m working on solr. i m interested in getting added to solr user group. > > Can you please add me to the group ? If mail from your address is reaching this list, you are already subscribed to it. Presumably, you did that from under https://lucene.apache.org

Re: solr-user Digest of: get.100322

On 5/21/2014 7:28 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > Just to re-emphasize the point - when provisioning Solr, you need to > ASSURE that the system has enough system memory so that the Solr index > on that system fits entirely in the OS file system cache. No ifs, > ands, or buts. If you fail to follow that

Re: solr-user Digest of: get.100322

org Subject: Re: solr-user Digest of: get.100322 On 5/20/2014 2:01 AM, Jeongseok Son wrote: Though it uses only small amount of memory I'm worried about memory usage because I have to store so many documents. (32GB RAM / total 5B docs, sum of docs. of all cores) If you've only got 32GB

Re: solr-user Digest of: get.100322

On 5/20/2014 2:01 AM, Jeongseok Son wrote: > Though it uses only small amount of memory I'm worried about memory > usage because I have to store so many documents. (32GB RAM / total 5B > docs, sum of docs. of all cores) If you've only got 32GB of RAM and there are five billion docs on the system,

Re: solr-user Digest of: get.100322

Thank you for your reply! I also found docValues after sending an email and your suggestion seems the best solution for me. Now I'm configuring schema.xml to use docValues and have a question about docValuesFormat. According to this thread( http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Trade-offs-in-choosin

RE: solr user group

: And still on the list... As Jack mentioned in his 18 Sep 2012 reply to your original email... https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201209.mbox/%3CD8AD75DD68FD45618D83C8CE3F93803E@JackKrupansky%3E >> Did you send them from the exact same email address as the original >>

RE: solr user group

And still on the list... David Hill Iowa Student Loan | Lead Software Analyst / Developer | phone 515-273-7241 | fax 515-273-7241 | dh...@studentloan.org -Original Message- From: David Hill Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 6:58 AM To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org' Subject: solr user

Re: solr user group

Did you send them from the exact same email address as the original subscriptions? Did you follow all of the suggestions listed at the "Problems?" link on the discussions page? See: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Unsubscribing%20from%20mailing%20lists -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message--

Re: solr-user-unsubscribe

Just FYI folks, this doesn't work. You need to send mail to solr-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org, not the list. Michael Della Bitta Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017 www.appinions.com Where Influence Isn’t a Game On

Re: Solr User Interface

Hi, You can to send "wt" param to Solr such as follow: &wt=json or &wt=phps In the first case, Solr result are retorned in JSON format response and the second case, are returned in PHP serialized format. Regards. El 19/07/11 15:46, serenity keningston escribió: Hi, I installed Solr 3.2 an

Re: solr-user

Please start a new thread with this topic in the subject line. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:37 PM, ankita shinde wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: ankita shinde > Date: Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:19 AM > Subject: solr-user > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > hello, > Is there

Re: solr-user

I updated the SolrJ JAR requirements to be clearer on the wiki page given how many of these SolrJ emails I saw coming through since joining the list. I just created a test java class and imported the removed JARs until I found out the minimal set required. On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Erick Eric

Re: solr-user

I suspect you're not actually including the path to those jars. SolrException should be in your solrj jar file. You can test this by executing "jar -tf apacheBLAHBLAH.jar" which will dump all the class names in the jar file. I'm assuming that you're really including the version for the * in the sol

RE: solr user

You probably need to use the file:// moniker - if using firefox, install firebug and use the net panel to see if the includes load -Original Message- From: ankita shinde [mailto:ankitashinde...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 September 2010 18:22 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: solr user h

Re: solr user

Naming fields something_t but declaring them "string" will either not work, or cause confusion. On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:49 AM, kenf_nc wrote: > > You are querying for 'branch' and trying to place it in 'skill'. > > Also, you have Name and Column backwards, it should be: > > > > > > -- > View

Re: solr user

You are querying for 'branch' and trying to place it in 'skill'. Also, you have Name and Column backwards, it should be: -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-user-tp1404814p1406343.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: solr user

Hi Ankita, One reason could be that you are using area_t instead of city_t for mapping. So the association may not be taking place in Solr. Have you tried searching on skill? That should have worked for you. Pavan On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:10 PM, ankita shinde wrote: > hi, > I am able to index al

Re: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Excuse me again... it seems like my mail-provider has changed something. I hope this message won't pend again. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/solr-user-lucene-apache-org-tp679673p679684.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

>>> >>> The work being done is addressing the deletes, AIUI, but of course >>> there are other things happening during shutdown, too. >> There are no deletes to do. It was a clean index to begin with >> and there were no duplicates. >> > >I have not followed this thread, so forgive me if this has a

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

The work being done is addressing the deletes, AIUI, but of course there are other things happening during shutdown, too. There are no deletes to do. It was a clean index to begin with and there were no duplicates. I have not followed this thread, so forgive me if this has already been sugg

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

>On Apr 2, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote: > >> Grant, >> >> >> >>> I should note, however, that the speed difference you are seeing may >>> not be as pronounced as it appears. If I recall during ApacheCon, I >>> commented on how long it takes to shutdown your Solr instance when >>> exit

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

On Apr 2, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote: Grant, I should note, however, that the speed difference you are seeing may not be as pronounced as it appears. If I recall during ApacheCon, I commented on how long it takes to shutdown your Solr instance when exiting it. That time it t

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Grant, >I should note, however, that the speed difference you are seeing may >not be as pronounced as it appears. If I recall during ApacheCon, I >commented on how long it takes to shutdown your Solr instance when >exiting it. That time it takes is in fact Solr doing the work that >was

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote: Grant, Hmmm, the big difference is made by &overwrite=false. But, can you explain why &overwrite=false makes such a difference. I am starting off with an empty index and I have checked the content there are no duplicates in the uniqueKey field

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

>On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote: > >> Grant, >> >> Redoing the work with your patch applied does not seem to > >> >> make a difference! Is this the expected result? > >No, I didn't expect Solr 1095 to fix the problem. Overwrite = false + >1095, does, however, AFAICT by your la

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote: Grant, Redoing the work with your patch applied does not seem to make a difference! Is this the expected result? No, I didn't expect Solr 1095 to fix the problem. Overwrite = false + 1095, does, however, AFAICT by your last line, righ

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Grant, Redoing the work with your patch applied does not seem to make a difference! Is this the expected result? I did run it again using the full file, this time using my Imac:- 643465took 22min 14sec 2008-04-01 734796 73min 58sec 2009-01-15

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Grant, I am messing with the script, and with your tip I expect I can make it recurse over as many releases as needed. I did run it again using the full file, this time using my Imac:- 643465took 22min 14sec 2008-04-01 734796 73min 58sec 2009-

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Can you try adding &overwrite=false and running against the latest version? My current working theory is that Solr/Lucene has changed how deletes are handled such that work that was deferred before is now not deferred as often. In fact, you are not seeing this cost paid (or at least not n

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

svn co -r REV_NUM https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk solr-REV_NUM -Grant On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Fergus McMenemie wrote: Can you verify that rev 701485 still performs reasonably well? This is from October 2008 and I get similar results to the earlier rev. Am now tryin

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

>Can you verify that rev 701485 still performs reasonably well? This >is from October 2008 and I get similar results to the earlier rev. >Am now trying some other versions between October and when you first >reported the issue in November. OK. Can you tell me how to get a hold of revisio

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Grant, After all my playing about at boot camp, I gave things a rest. It was not till months later that got back to looking at solr again. So after 643465 (2008-Apr-01) the next version I tried was 694377 from (2008-Sep-11). Nothing in between. Yep so 643465 is the latest version I tried that st

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Can you verify that rev 701485 still performs reasonably well? This is from October 2008 and I get similar results to the earlier rev. Am now trying some other versions between October and when you first reported the issue in November. -Grant On Mar 30, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Grant Ingersol

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Fregus, Is rev 643465 the absolute latest you tried that still performs? i.e. every revision after is slower? -Grant On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Fergus, I think the problem may actually be due to something that was introduced by a change to Solr's StopFilterFac

Re: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Fergus, I think the problem may actually be due to something that was introduced by a change to Solr's StopFilterFactory and the way it loads the stop words set. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1095 I am in the process of testing it out and will let you know. -Grant On Mar

RE: [solr-user] Upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 gives 3x slowdown

Hey Fergus, Finally got a chance to run your scripts, etc. per the thread: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/5c3de15a4e61095c/upgrade_from_1_2_to_1_3_gives_3x_slowdown_script#8324a98d8840c623 I can reproduce your slowdown. One oddity with rev 643465 is: On the old version, there

Re: [solr-user] Correct query syntax for a multivalued string field?

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > color:red AND color:green > > +color:red +color:green > > Either one works. Just what I was looking for, thanks for the quick response and for helping a new user. hs > wunder > > On 9/9/08 3:47 PM, "hernan" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [solr-user] Correct query syntax for a multivalued string field?

color:red AND color:green +color:red +color:green Either one works. wunder On 9/9/08 3:47 PM, "hernan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Solr users, > > My schema defines a field like this: > > multiValued="true"/> > > If I have a document indexed that has the following values for this > fi

Re: Solr user interface

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lars Kotthoff wrote: > Hi all, > > I've written a user interface for Solr (Spring web application) which I'd be > willing to donate if people are interested. > > You can see a demo here http://larsko.dyndns.org:8080/solr-ui/search.html, SVN > reposi

Re: Solr user interface

Hi Lars, Use solr with tomcat u will get interface from tomcat itself. Regards Sanjay On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Lars Kotthoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've written a user interface for Solr (Spring web application) which I'd > be > willing to donate if people are interes