Re: Replication Problem from solr-3.6 to solr-4.0

2014-07-23 Thread Sree..
I did optimize the master and the slave started replicating the indices! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replication-Problem-from-solr-3-6-to-solr-4-0-tp4025028p4148953.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replication Problem from solr-3.6 to solr-4.0

2014-07-22 Thread askumar1444
- Starting replication process 11:17:30.713 [snapPuller-8-thread-1] ERROR o.a.s.h.SnapPuller - No files to download for index generation: 87 Any solution/fix for it? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replication-Problem-from-solr-3-6-to-solr-4-0-tp4025028p4148703

Re: Replication Problem from solr-3.6 to solr-4.0

2014-03-07 Thread yuegary
is running solr 3.5 Would you be able to shed some light? Thank you in advance! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replication-Problem-from-solr-3-6-to-solr-4-0-tp4025028p4121896.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Question about replication problem

2013-12-20 Thread Fred Drake
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > What Solr version? I've seen the first problem in the thread with Solr 4.1, and the second with both 4.1 and 4.6. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. "A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein

Re: Question about replication problem

2013-12-20 Thread Mark Miller
What Solr version? - Mark On Dec 20, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Fred Drake wrote: > Here's another sequence of messages I frequently see where replication > isn't happening with no clearly identified cause: > > INFO org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller; Starting replication process > INFO org.apache.so

Re: Question about replication problem

2013-12-20 Thread Fred Drake
Here's another sequence of messages I frequently see where replication isn't happening with no clearly identified cause: INFO org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller; Starting replication process INFO org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller; Master's generation: 6 INFO org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller;

Question about replication problem

2013-12-16 Thread Fred Drake
I have a multi-core master/slave configuration that's showing unexpected replication behavior for one core; other cores are replicating without problems. The master is running Solr 4.1; one slave is running 4.1 under Tomcat, and another (for testing) is running 4.6 under Jetty. These are exhibiti

Re: Solr 4.0 replication problem

2012-03-23 Thread Erick Erickson
In that case, I'm kind of stuck. You've already rebuilt your index from scratch and removed it from your slaves. That should have cleared out most everything that could be an issue. I'd suggest you set up a pair of machines from scratch and try to set up an index/replication with your current schem

Re: Solr 4.0 replication problem

2012-03-23 Thread Hakan İlter
Hi Erick, It's not possible because both master and slaves using same binaries. Thanks... On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Hmmm, looking at your stack trace in a bit more detail, this is really > suspicious: > > Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooNewExcept

Re: Solr 4.0 replication problem

2012-03-23 Thread Erick Erickson
Hmmm, looking at your stack trace in a bit more detail, this is really suspicious: Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooNewException: Format version is not supported in file 'segments_1': -12 (needs to be between -9 and -11) This *looks* like your Solr version on your slave is older t

Re: Solr 4.0 replication problem

2012-03-23 Thread Hakan İlter
Hi Erick, I've already tried step 2 and 3 but it didn't help. It's almost impossible to do step 1 for us because of project dead-line. Do you have any other suggestion? Thank your reply. On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Hmmm, that is odd. But a trunk build from that lon

Re: Solr 4.0 replication problem

2012-03-23 Thread Erick Erickson
Hmmm, that is odd. But a trunk build from that long ago is going to be almost impossible to debug/fix. The problem with working from trunk is that this kind of problem won't get much attention. I have three suggestions: 1> update to current trunk. NOTE: you'll have to completely reindex your

Solr 4.0 replication problem

2012-03-21 Thread Hakan İlter
Hi everyone, We are using very early version of Solr 4.0 and we've some replication problems. Actually we used this build more than one year without any problem but when I made some changes on schema.xml, the following problem started. I've just changed schema.xml with adding multiValued="true" a

Re: Replication problem on windows

2012-02-06 Thread Rafał Kuć
Hello! Thanks for the answer Shawn. -- Regards, Rafał Kuć Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > On 2/6/2012 3:04 AM, Rafał Kuć wrote: >> Hello! >> >> We have Solr running on Windows. Once in a while we see a problem with >> replication failing. While slave server replic

Re: Replication problem on windows

2012-02-06 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 2/6/2012 3:04 AM, Rafał Kuć wrote: Hello! We have Solr running on Windows. Once in a while we see a problem with replication failing. While slave server replicates the index, it throws exception like the following: SEVERE: Unable to copy index file from: D:\web\solr\collection\data\index.20

Replication problem on windows

2012-02-06 Thread Rafał Kuć
Hello! We have Solr running on Windows. Once in a while we see a problem with replication failing. While slave server replicates the index, it throws exception like the following: SEVERE: Unable to copy index file from: D:\web\solr\collection\data\index.2011102510\_3s.fdt to: D:\web\solr\Col

Replication Problem

2011-06-20 Thread Rafael Pappert [FWP Systems GmbH]
Hello List, What's wrong with my replication? One of my slaves logs this from time to time. The slave runs on 3.1.0. 20.06.2011 12:31:32 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SCHWERWIEGEND: ClientAbortException: java.io.IOException at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.realWr

Re: Strange replication problem

2010-12-13 Thread Xin Li
did you double check http://machine:port/solr/website/admin/replication/ to see the "master" is indeed a master? On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ralf Mattes wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:31:27 -0500, Xin Li wrote: > >> " indexversion returned by the indexversion command is 0 while the same >>

Re: Strange replication problem

2010-12-13 Thread Ralf Mattes
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:31:27 -0500, Xin Li wrote: > " indexversion returned by the indexversion command is 0 while the same > information from the details command is 292192351652 ..." > > This only happens to a Slave machine. For a Master machine, indexversion > returns the same number as details

Re: Strange replication problem

2010-12-13 Thread Xin Li
" indexversion returned by the indexversion command is 0 while the same information from the details command is 292192351652 ..." This only happens to a Slave machine. For a Master machine, indexversion returns the same number as details command. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ralf Mattes

Strange replication problem

2010-12-13 Thread Ralf Mattes
Hello list, I'm trying to set up a replicating solr system (one master, one slave) here. Everything _looks_ o.k. but replication fails. A little debugging shows the following: r...@slave:~# curl 'http://master:8180/solr/website/replication?command=indexversion&wt=json' && echo '' {"responseH

Re: Replication problem

2010-01-12 Thread Jason Rutherglen
Multiple replicateAfter for example: startup,optimize I believe this was causing the issue, I limited it to commit, and it started to work (with no other changes to solrconfig.xml) On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Jason Rutherglen > wrote:

Re: Replication problem

2010-01-12 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > It was having multiple replicateAfter values... Perhaps a bug, though > I probably won't spend time investigating the why right now, nor > reproducing in the test cases. Do you mean that you changed the config and now it's working? We hav

Re: Replication problem

2010-01-12 Thread Jason Rutherglen
It was having multiple replicateAfter values... Perhaps a bug, though I probably won't spend time investigating the why right now, nor reproducing in the test cases. On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Hmm...Even with the IP address in the master URL on the slave, the > in

Re: Replication problem

2010-01-12 Thread Jason Rutherglen
Hmm...Even with the IP address in the master URL on the slave, the indexversion command to the master mysteriously doesn't show the latest commit... Totally freakin' bizarre! On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > There's a connect exception on the client, however I'd expect

Re: Replication problem

2010-01-12 Thread Jason Rutherglen
There's a connect exception on the client, however I'd expect this to show up in the slave replication console (it's not). Is this correct behavior (i.e. not showing replication errors)? On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Yonik, > > I added startup to replicateAfter, howe

Re: Replication problem

2010-01-11 Thread Jason Rutherglen
Yonik, I added startup to replicateAfter, however no dice... There's no errors the Tomcat log. The output of: http://localhost-master:8080/solr/main/replication?command=indexversion 0 0 0 0 The master replication UI: Local Index Index Version: 1263182366335, Generation: 3 Locati

Re: Replication problem

2010-01-11 Thread Yonik Seeley
Did you try adding "startup" to the list of events to replicate after? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Hi, sorry for the somewhat inane question: > > I setup replication request handler on the master however I'm not > seeing any

Replication problem

2010-01-11 Thread Jason Rutherglen
Hi, sorry for the somewhat inane question: I setup replication request handler on the master however I'm not seeing any replicatable indexes via http://localhost:8080/solr/main/replication?command=indexversion Queries such as *:* yield results on the master (so I assume the commit worked). The re