-Original Message-
From: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using
FastVectorHighlighter
Andy,
I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return
Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:16 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using
FastVectorHighlighter
Andy,
OK, I get what you're doing. As far as alternate paths, you could index
normally and use
: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using
FastVectorHighlighter
Andy,
I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The
size
of the index is only 20.93 MB. The JVM heap Xms and Xmx are both
: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using
FastVectorHighlighter
Andy,
I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The
size
Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using
FastVectorHighlighter
Andy,
I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The
size
: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using
FastVectorHighlighter
Andy,
I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The
size
fields and it returns in 850 ms with
highlighting.
Any ideas?
- Andy
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using
Highlighter Performance Even Using
FastVectorHighlighter
My guess is that the problem is those 200M documents.
FastVectorHighlighter is fast at deciding whether a match, especially a
phrase, appears in a document, but it still starts out by walking the
entire list of term vectors, and ends by breaking
I'm providing a search feature in a web app that searches for documents
that range in size from 1KB to 200MB of varying MIME types (PDF, DOC,
etc). Currently there are about 3000 documents and this will continue to
grow. I'm providing full word search and partial word search. For each
document,
that it has been a good rule
of thumb for us).
-- Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Andy Brown [mailto:andy_br...@rhoworld.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 9:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter
I'm providing a search feature
10 matches
Mail list logo