RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-18 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
-Original Message- From: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter Andy, I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-18 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:16 PM To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org' Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter Andy, OK, I get what you're doing. As far as alternate paths, you could index normally and use

Re: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-17 Thread Floyd Wu
: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter Andy, I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The size of the index is only 20.93 MB. The JVM heap Xms and Xmx are both

Re: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-15 Thread Michael Sokolov
: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter Andy, I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The size

Re: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-15 Thread Michael McCandless
Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter Andy, I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The size

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-14 Thread Andy Brown
: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:44 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter Andy, I don't understand why it's taking 7 secs to return highlights. The size

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-05-29 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
fields and it returns in 850 ms with highlighting. Any ideas? - Andy -Original Message- From: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:39 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-05-22 Thread Andy Brown
Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter My guess is that the problem is those 200M documents. FastVectorHighlighter is fast at deciding whether a match, especially a phrase, appears in a document, but it still starts out by walking the entire list of term vectors, and ends by breaking

Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-05-20 Thread Andy Brown
I'm providing a search feature in a web app that searches for documents that range in size from 1KB to 200MB of varying MIME types (PDF, DOC, etc). Currently there are about 3000 documents and this will continue to grow. I'm providing full word search and partial word search. For each document,

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-05-20 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
that it has been a good rule of thumb for us). -- Bryan -Original Message- From: Andy Brown [mailto:andy_br...@rhoworld.com] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 9:53 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter I'm providing a search feature