thanks Ahmet..my problem solved...reason of slow performance of facet query
was : not doing setRows(0)..
once i done it then it came out in seconds like terms query.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thats a different problem : speed-up faceting.
> Faceting used all
Hi,
Thats a different problem : speed-up faceting.
Faceting used all over the place and it is fast. I suggest you looks for
faceting improvements.
Ahmet
On Friday, January 16, 2015 11:17 AM, Naresh Yadav wrote:
I tried facetting also but not worked smoothly for me. Case i had mentioned
in em
I tried facetting also but not worked smoothly for me. Case i had mentioned
in email is dummy one and my actual index is with
12 lakh docs and 2 GB size on single machine. Each of tenant_pool field
value has 20-30 tokens.
Getting all terms in tenant_pool is fast in seconds but when i go with
facet
Hi Naresh,
Yup terms component does not respect q or fq parameter.
Luckily, thats easy with facet component. Example :
facet=true&facet.field=tenant_pool&q=type:1
Please see more here : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Faceting
happy faceting,
ahmet
On Friday, January 16, 20
Hi ahmet,
Thanks, now i understand better, i will not try my usecase with grouping.
Actually i am interested in unique terms in a field i.e tenant_pool. That i
get perfectly with http://www.imagesup.net/?di=614212438580
But i am not able to get terms after applying some filter say "type":"1".
Tha
Hi Naresh,
I have never grouped on a tokenised field and I am not sure it makes sense to
do so.
Reading back ref-guide it says this about group.field parameter
"The name of the field by which to group results. The field must be
single-valued, and either be indexed or a field type that has a va
Hi ahmet,
If you observe output ngroups is 1 and returning only one group P1.
But my expectation is it should return three groups P1, L1, L2 as my
field is tokenized with space.
Please correct me if wrong?
On 1/15/15, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> Everything looks correct, what is th
Hi Naresh,
Everything looks correct, what is the problem here?
If you want to see more than one document per group, there is a parameter for
that which defaults to 1.
Ahmet
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:02 AM, Naresh Yadav
wrote:
Hi all,
I had done following configuration to test Solr
Hi all,
I had done following configuration to test Solr grouping concept.
solr version : 4.6.1 (tried in latest version 4.10.3 also)
Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
Solrj code to insert docs :http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124381116
Response Group's : http://www.images
