Re: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Miller
On May 21, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I think the reason that you see a multiple values error when you try the > other order is because of the lack of a document clone (the other issue I > mentioned a few emails back). Addressing that won't solve your issue though I take that back

RE: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-21 Thread Markus Jelsma
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3473 -Original message- > From:Mark Miller > Sent: Mon 21-May-2012 18:11 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: SolrCloud deduplication > > Looking again at the SignatureUpdateProcessor code, I think that in

Re: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Miller
rkus >> >> >> >> -Original message- >>> From:Mark Miller >>> Sent: Fri 18-May-2012 16:05 >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Markus Jelsma >>> Subject: Re: SolrCloud deduplication >>> >>> Hey Markus - >>

RE: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-21 Thread Markus Jelsma
to try? Thanks Markus -Original message- > From:Markus Jelsma > Sent: Mon 21-May-2012 15:58 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Mark Miller > Subject: RE: SolrCloud deduplication > > Hi, > > SOLR-2822 seems to work just fine as long as the SignatureP

RE: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-21 Thread Markus Jelsma
Subject: Re: SolrCloud deduplication > > Hey Markus - > > When I ran into a similar issue with another update proc, I created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3215 so that I could order things > to avoid this. I have not committed this yet though, in favor of waiting fo

RE: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-18 Thread Markus Jelsma
you're right. I'll test the patch as soon as possible. Thanks! -Original message- > From:Chris Hostetter > Sent: Fri 18-May-2012 18:20 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: SolrCloud deduplication > > > : Interesting! I'm watching the

RE: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-18 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Interesting! I'm watching the issues and will test as soon as they are committed. FWIW: it's a chicken and egg problem -- if you could test out the patch in SOLR-2822 with your real world use case / configs, and comment on it's effectiveness, that would go a long way towards my confidence in

RE: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-18 Thread Markus Jelsma
Hi, Interesting! I'm watching the issues and will test as soon as they are committed. Thanks! -Original message- > From:Mark Miller > Sent: Fri 18-May-2012 16:05 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Markus Jelsma > Subject: Re: SolrCloud deduplication > > H

Re: SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-18 Thread Mark Miller
Hey Markus - When I ran into a similar issue with another update proc, I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3215 so that I could order things to avoid this. I have not committed this yet though, in favor of waiting for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2822 Go vote? :)

SolrCloud deduplication

2012-05-18 Thread Markus Jelsma
Hi, Deduplication on SolrCloud through the SignatureUpdateRequestProcessor is not functional anymore. The problem is that documents are passed multiple times through the URP and the digest field is added as if it is an multi valued field. If the field is not multi valued you'll get this typica