On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 07:17:43PM +0100, me said:
It was just an idea though and I was hoping that there would be a
simpler more orthodox way of doing it.
In the end, for anyone who cares, we used dynamic fields.
There are a lot of them but we haven't seen performance impacted that
badly so
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 06:31:19PM -0400, Erick Erickson said:
I'm confused. What do you mean that a user can set any
number of arbitrarily named fields on a document. It sounds
like you are talking about a user adding arbitrarily may entries
to a multi-valued field? Or is it some kind of
I'm confused. What do you mean that a user can set any
number of arbitrarily named fields on a document. It sounds
like you are talking about a user adding arbitrarily may entries
to a multi-valued field? Or is it some kind of key:value pairs
in a field in your schema?
Under any circumstances,
