large
monster, since we only want him for http-caching.
Do you know any benchmarks about responses per second, if most of the
queried data is in the cache?
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-cache-or-to-not-cache-tp1875289p1881714.html
Sent from the Solr
PS: There's also, I think, a way to turn on HTTP-level caching for Solr,
which I believe is caching of entire responses that match an exact Solr
query, filled without actually touching Solr at all. But I'm not sure
about this, because I'm always trying to make sure this HTTP-level cache
is turn
You know, on further reflection, I'd suggest you think (and ideally
measure) hard about whether you even need this application-level
solr-data-cache.
Solr is a caching machine, it's kind of what Solr does, one of the main
focuses of Solr. A query to Solr that hits the right caches comes back
the
whole application.
Since this is only a conceptual question, I really do not have got any
benchmark - data.
But if I have some, I will ask if it was possible to publish them.
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-cache-or-to-not-cache-tp1875289p1877245
Em wrote:
My first query is "red firefox" - all caches were turned on.
If I am searching now for "red star", does this query makes any usage from
the cache, since both share the term "red"?
I don't believe it does, no.
I understand your question -- if your caching things externally anyway,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Em wrote:
>
> Thank you Shalin.
> Yes, both - Solr and some other applications could possible run on the same
> box.
> I hoped that not storing redundantly in Solr and somewhere else in the RAM
> would not touch Solr's performance very much.
>
> Just to understand
ry is "red firefox" - all caches were turned on.
If I am searching now for "red star", does this query makes any usage from
the cache, since both share the term "red"?
Kind regards
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-cache-or-to-not-ca
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Em wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> in one of our application's use-case scenarios we create a response from
> different data sources.
> In clear words: We combine different responses from different data sources
> (SQL, another Webservice and Solr) to one response.
>
> We
using the filterCache makes sense, but what about documentCache and
the others?
Since I retrive in 95-98% of all cases the same field from our stored
documents, how can I boost retriving that information?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/To-cache-or-to
