On Jan 23, 2008 1:29 PM, Chris Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then if you're using
a client such as solrsharp, there's the question of whether *it* will
slurp the whole stream into memory.
Solrsharp reads of the XML stream from Solr use standard dotnet framework
XML objects, which by
On Jan 22, 2008 4:10 PM, Owens, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got some memory constraint worries from using Java RMI, although I can
see this problem could effect the xml requests too. The Java code doesn't
seem to handle large files as streams.
It depends on what component we are
On Jan 23, 2008 9:04 AM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 4:10 PM, Owens, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got some memory constraint worries from using Java RMI, although I
can see this problem could effect the xml requests too. The Java code
doesn't seem to
On Jan 23, 2008 4:29 PM, Chris Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supposing you could do this -- i.e. that you could get Solr to pass a
particular field's data to Lucene without reading it all into memory
first --, are there any potential problems on the Lucene end? It's not
going to turn around
Hello,
We've got some memory constraint worries from using Java RMI, although I can
see this problem could effect the xml requests too. The Java code doesn't seem
to handle large files as streams. Now we're thinking that there are two
possible solutions, either the exists or we create a file
