On 9/17/2010 7:22 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
a) not really. assuming you have no problem modifying the indexing code
in the way you want, and are primarily worried about searching from
various clients, then the most straight forward approach is probably to
use RewriteRules (or something equivi
: I would like to drop ft_text and make each index shard 3GB smaller, but make
: it so that any queries which use ft_text get automatically redirected to
: catchall. Ultimately we will be replacing catchall with dismax and
: eliminating it. After the switch to dismax is complete and catchall is
I find myself in need of the ability to access one field by more than
one name, for application transition purposes. Right now we have a
field (ft_text, by far the largest part of the index) that is indexed
but not stored. This field and three others are copied into an
additional field calle
