Re: a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-30 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > > Well, we don't use multicore feature of SOLR, so in our case SOLR : > instances : > > are just separate web-apps. The web-app loading order probably then : > affects : > > on which app gets hold of a jmx 'pipe'. A feature was added in SOLR-1843 specificly to help address this potential col

Re: a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-29 Thread Dmitry Kan
That's absolutely right. Thanks for the suggestion. On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > > Well, we don't use multicore feature of SOLR, so in our case SOLR > instances > > are just separate web-apps. The web-app loading ord

Re: a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-29 Thread Gora Mohanty
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Well, we don't use multicore feature of SOLR, so in our case SOLR instances > are just separate web-apps. The web-app loading order probably then affects > on which app gets hold of a jmx 'pipe'. > We should probably start using the feature to c

Re: a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-29 Thread Dmitry Kan
Well, we don't use multicore feature of SOLR, so in our case SOLR instances are just separate web-apps. The web-app loading order probably then affects on which app gets hold of a jmx 'pipe'. We should probably start using the feature to collect stats from different cores at the same time. Thanks.

Re: a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-29 Thread Alexey Serba
Which Solr version do you use? Maybe it has something to do with default collection? I do see separate jmx domain for every collection, i.e. solr/collection1 solr/collection2 solr/collection3 ... On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Hello list, > > This might be not the right pl

Re: a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-21 Thread Gora Mohanty
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Hello list, > > This might be not the right place to ask the jmx specific questions, but I > decided to try, as we are polling SOLR statistics through jmx. > > We currently have two solr cores with different schemas A and B being run > under the

Re: a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-21 Thread Dmitry Kan
Solved by exposing jmx only on one of the cores, as it is of a more interest than the other one. Dmitry On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Hello list, > > This might be not the right place to ask the jmx specific questions, but I > decided to try, as we are polling SOLR stati

a question on jmx solr exposure

2011-12-21 Thread Dmitry Kan
Hello list, This might be not the right place to ask the jmx specific questions, but I decided to try, as we are polling SOLR statistics through jmx. We currently have two solr cores with different schemas A and B being run under the same tomcat instance. Question is: which stat is jconsole going