See this
http://www.gettingahead.co.in/blogwp/2011/03/technical/solr/shalini/some-info-about-extended-dismax-query-parser/
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-available-in-solr-3-1-tp2910613p2922128.html
Sent
It's already much better than the old dismax, and probably more stable.
If you do not require the ability to lock down what fields people should be
allowed to search for, I suggest you start using it right away. If you require
to lock that down, I suggest you help out finishing that part of
Jan, is there already an issue for that?
It's already much better than the old dismax, and probably more stable.
If you do not require the ability to lock down what fields people should be
allowed to search for, I suggest you start using it right away. If you
require to lock that down, I
: It's already much better than the old dismax, and probably more stable.
: If you do not require the ability to lock down what fields people should
: be allowed to search for, I suggest you start using it right away. If
: you require to lock that down, I suggest you help out finishing that
:
Is it a formal feature that solr 3.1 support? Or still as experimental
feature? If it is experimental feature, i would still be hesitating to use
it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-available-in-solr-3-1-tp2910613p2920975.html
Sent from the Solr -
is edixmax available in solr 3.1? I don't see any
documentation about it.
if it is, does it support the prefix and fuzzy query?
Yes and yes. See snippet taken from changes.txt
New Features
--
* SOLR-1553: New dismax parser implementation (accessible as edismax)
that
Hi,
is edixmax available in solr 3.1? I don't see any documentation about it.
if it is, does it support the prefix and fuzzy query?
Thanks,
cy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-available-in-solr-3-1-tp2910613p2910613.html
Sent from the Solr - User
