=%2Fedismaxqf=ac_source_idfl=ac_source_idhl=truehl.mergeContiguous=truehl.useFastVectorHighlighter=truehl.fl=ac_source_id
This is what comes back in highlighting response
arr name=ac_source_id
strem2282372/em/str
/arr
What I expect is em22/em82372 as it was in Solr 3.6. Also I noticed when
I run
Hello,
I am trying to make a typehead autocomplete with SOLR using the suggester.
The search will be done for users and group names which aggregate users.
The search will be done on usernames , bio , web page and other stuff. What
I want to achieve is sort of facebook or twitter alike search.
think) because of the term*=true
settings.
Thanks again,
Fatima
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
Hi Fatima,
To enable higlighting
Hello,
I'm trying to highlight content that is returned from a Solr query, but I can't
seem to get it working.
I would like to highlight the documentname and the pagetext or content
results, but when I run the search I don't get anything returned. I thought
that the content field is supposed
Also my highlighting defaults...
requestHandler name=/browse class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
!-- Highlighting defaults --
str name=hlon/str
str name=hl.flcontent documentname/str
str name=hl.encoderhtml/str
str name=hl.simple.prelt;bgt
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:44 AM, Fatima Issawi issa...@qu.edu.qa
wrote:
Also my highlighting defaults...
requestHandler name=/browse class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
!-- Highlighting defaults --
str name=hlon/str
str name=hl.flcontent documentname/str
, 2014 5:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
Hi Fatima,
To enable higlighting (both standard and fastvector) you need to make
stored=true.
Term vectors may speed up standard highlighter. Plus they are mandatory
for FastVectorHighligher.
https
I have indexed data using Solr.I want to highlight matched keyword in
search results. highlighting is inconsistent.
eg. if search keyword is 'alonso'.
highlighted instances are: *Alonso*,fernando_*alonso*,**#Alonso**MeetVettel
non-highlightes instances are : @fernandoalonso, www.alonsodriver.com
-lucene.com/m/HiKY02e1KgI1
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:57 AM, harsh kapoor harshlnm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have indexed data using Solr.I want to highlight matched keyword in
search results. highlighting is inconsistent.
eg. if search keyword is 'alonso'.
highlighted instances are: *Alonso
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for your reply but i am still not clear on this.Why highlighting
occurs in text (fernando_*alonso, *Fernando*Alonso*(CamelCase) ) these are
also words and Solr is highlighting inside words.
But no highlighting takes place in lowercase 'fernandoalonso'. why is this?
On Thu
reply but i am still not clear on this.Why highlighting
occurs in text (fernando_*alonso, *Fernando*Alonso*(CamelCase) ) these are
also words and Solr is highlighting inside words.
But no highlighting takes place in lowercase 'fernandoalonso'. why is this?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ahmet
=text at analysis page.
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:51 AM, harsh kapoor
harshlnm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for your reply but i am still not clear on this.Why highlighting
occurs in text (fernando_*alonso, *Fernando*Alonso*(CamelCase) ) these are
also words and Solr
I have setup my highlight as follows:
bool name=hltrue/bool
str name=hl.flname age address/str
However I don't want *name* be highlighted *but *included inside response:
highlighting: {
Something_myid: {
name: emSomething/em bla bla,
age: emSomething/em age bla bla
there is not a highlighted match of its fields. Because I want to get
the first response and if there is a highlighted field at highlighting list
I want to use highlighted match if not I want to use plain version. I know
that I can use *id * field of response document to get highlighted fields
of it but my ids
:
highlighting: {
Something_myid: {
name: emSomething/em bla bla,
age: emSomething/em age bla bla,
address: emSomething/em age bla bla
}
}
*or:*
I want to group them on name field instead of id:
highlighting: {
Something bla bla: {
age: emSomething/em age bla bla,
address: emSomething/em age
highlighting on that unique field instead of id.
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
20 Kasım 2013 Çarşamba tarihinde Stefan Matheis matheis.ste...@gmail.com
adlı kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
Solr is using the UniqueKey you defined for your documents, that
shouldn't be a problem, since you can lookup the document from
Hi,
i'm new in Solr. I use Solr-3.6.o and i tried to use the highlighting
parameters to obtaine a result like Goolge. (if the searched word appears in
the title, this word must be bold).
Example
searched word = solr
retrieve document title
welcome in *Solr*
the highlighting parameters that i
I'm seeing a rare behavior of the gap fragmenter on solr 3.6. Right now this is
my configuration for the gap fragmenter:
fragmenter name=gap
default=true
class=solr.highlight.GapFragmenter
lst name=defaults
int name=hl.fragsize150/int
the highlighting function in Solr the right way ?
I have googled but cannot find any relevant results.
Could someone share her/his experience in using standard highlighther, fast
vector highlighter and posting highlighter ?
Thanks for every hints.
This is a too broad question. If you have specific questions or want to see
other users' problems about highlighting feature at Solr you can check
here:
http://search-lucene.com/?q=highlightingfc_project=Solrfc_type=mail+_hash_+user
On the other hand you can read Using Additional Solr
Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI [mailto:furkankam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline
This is a too broad question. If you have specific questions or want to see
other users' problems about
There are some detailed examples in my e-book as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erwin Gunadi
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline
Hi Furkan,
thanks for the reply.
I
Hi Jack,
thank you for the hint.
Best Regards
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline
There are some detailed examples
? Highlighting exact phrases with solr
Good morning,
Please, help me giving any idea/solution to the problem?
Thanks a lot in advance
Sil,
Silvia Suárez Barón
I+D+I
http://www.anpro21.com/
972 989 470 / s...@anpro21.com / http://www.anpro21.com/twitter
http://www.anpro21
(span class=\item\);
solrQuery.setHighlightSimplePost(/span);
solrQuery.set(hl.usePhraseHighlighter, true);
Then, It works (error disappears), but Highlighting does not work :( :
lst name=highlighting
lst name=35254502/
lst name=35237409/
/lst
lst name=termVectors
str
-
From: Silvia Suárez [mailto:s...@anpro21.com]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 1:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Koji Sekiguchi
Subject: Re: Please any idea? Highlighting exact phrases with solr
Good morning,
Please, help me giving any idea/solution to the problem?
Thanks a lot
ในประเทศต่างๆนั้นถือว่าเป็นธุรกิจที่สำคัญหรือไม่
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-question-tp501425p4095210.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
);
solrQuery.set(hl.usePhraseHighlighter, true);
Then, It works (error disappears), but Highlighting does not work :( :
lst name=highlighting
lst name=35254502/
lst name=35237409/
/lst
lst name=termVectors
str name=uniqueKeyFieldNamec_noticia/str
lst name=warnings
arr name=noTermVectors
strc_region/str
);
solrQuery.setHighlightSimplePre(span class=\item\);
solrQuery.setHighlightSimplePost(/span);
solrQuery.set(hl.usePhraseHighlighter, true);
Then, It works (error disappears), but Highlighting does not work :( :
lst name=highlighting
lst name=35254502/
lst name=35237409
);
Then, It works (error disappears), but Highlighting does not work :( :
lst name=highlighting
lst name=35254502/
lst name=35237409/
/lst
lst name=termVectors
str name=uniqueKeyFieldNamec_noticia/str
lst name=warnings
arr name=noTermVectors
strc_region/str
strc_idioma/str
strc_pais/str
I am using solrj as client for indexing documents on the solr server I am
new to solr, And I am having problem with the highlighting in solr.
Highlighting exact phrases with solr does not work.
For example if the search keyword is: dulce hogar it returns:
span class=item dulce /span span class
(13/10/10 18:17), Silvia Suárez wrote:
I am using solrj as client for indexing documents on the solr server I am
new to solr, And I am having problem with the highlighting in solr.
Highlighting exact phrases with solr does not work.
For example if the search keyword is: dulce hogar it returns
ที่ได้รับมาตราฐานมีความปลอดภัยด้วยการใช้เทคโนโลยีที่ซับซ้อนในการเข้ารหัส
รวมทั้งไฟร์วอลล์และเทคโนโลยีป้องกันความปลอดภัยของรายละเอียดส่วนบุคคล
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-question-tp501425p4093238.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hi,
I'm having some issues with Solr search results (using Solr 1.4 ) . I have
enabled highlighting of searched text (hl=true) and set the fragment size as
500 (hl.fragsize=500) in the search query.
Below is the (screen shot) results shown when I searched for the term
'grandfather' (2 results
I’m having some issues with Solr search results (using Solr 1.4 ) . I
have enabled highlighting of searched text (hl=true) and set the fragment
size as 500 (hl.fragsize=500) in the search query.
Below is the (screen shot) results shown when I searched for the term
‘grandfather’ (2 results
Hello, I am dealing with an issue of highlighting and so far the other posts
that I've read have not provided a solution.
When using proximity search (coming soon~10) I get some documents with no
highlights and some documents highlight these words even when they are not
in a 10 word proximity
Hi,
I have gone through a lot of posts about Highlighting issues with Common
Grams but I am still a little confused. Below is my requirement:
- Highlighting needs to work properly with Common Grams
- Phrase highlighting needs to work
- Wildcard highlighting needs to work
Is this possible
Grams Highlighting
Hi,
I have gone through a lot of posts about Highlighting issues with Common
Grams but I am still a little confused. Below is my requirement:
- Highlighting needs to work properly with Common Grams
- Phrase highlighting needs to work
- Wildcard highlighting needs to work
now, do you remember how substantial the change was?
Are there any other options?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-externally-stored-text-tp4078387p4081719.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Just an update. Change was pretty straight forward (at least for my simple
test case) just a few lines in the getBestFragments method seemed to do the
trick.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-externally-stored-text-tp4078387p4081748.html
Sent
Hey Bryan, Thanks for the response! To make use of the
FastVectorHighlighter
you need to enable termVectors, termPositions, and termOffsets correct?
Which takes a considerable amount of space, but is good to know and I
may
possibly pursue this solution as well. Just starting to look at the
, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Jamshaid Ashraf jamshaid...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm using solr 4.3.0 following is the response against hit highlighting
request:
Request:
http://localhost:8080/solr/collection2/select?q=content:ps4hl=true
Response:
doc
arr name=contentstrThis post is regarding ps4
Ah, I think I misread your question. So your question is actually, how make
solr embed higlighting into the doc response itself. I'm not aware of such
a functionality. This why you have the highlighting section in your
response.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com
The JSON keys within the highlighting object are the document IDs, and
then the keys within those objects are the highlighted field names.
Again, I repeat my question: Exactly why is it difficult to deserialize?
Seems simple enough.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mysurf
Hi,
I'm using solr 4.3.0 following is the response against hit highlighting
request:
Request: http://localhost:8080/solr/collection2/select?q=content:ps4hl=true
Response:
doc
arr name=contentstrThis post is regarding ps4 accuracy and qulaity
which is smooth and factastic/str/arr
/doc
lst
Exactly why is it difficult to deserialize? Seems simple enough.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mysurf Mail
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 11:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: deserializing highlighting json result
When I request a json result I get
When I request a json result I get the following streucture in the
highlighting
{highlighting:{
394c65f1-dfb1-4b76-9b6c-2f14c9682cc9:{
PackageName:[- emTestingem channel twenty.]},
baf8434a-99a4-4046-8a4d-2f7ec09eafc8:{
PackageName:[- emTestingem channel twenty.]},
0a699062
:
Exactly why is it difficult to deserialize? Seems simple enough.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Mysurf Mail Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013
11:14 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: deserializing
highlighting json result
When I request a json result I get the following
results are not stored in my index. Has anyone been successful in reusing
the SOLR highlighting logic on non-stored data? Does anyone know if there
any other third party libraries that can do this for me until 1397 is
formally released?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066
I'm trying to find a way to best highlight search results even though
those
results are not stored in my index. Has anyone been successful in
reusing
the SOLR highlighting logic on non-stored data?
I was able to do this by slightly modifying the FastVectorHighlighter so
that it returned
I've just taken a peek at the src for DocTransformers. They get given a
TransformContext. That context contains the query and a few other bits
and pieces.
If it contained the response, DocTransformers would be able to do output
restructuring. The best example is hit highlighting. If you did:
hl
“drive” from the
hl.q field, it works correctly, which makes sense since given the error. I
just don’t understand why it’s not using the “qf” or “fl.hl” fields to query
against.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-using-hl-q-without-a-df
/str
/lst
/requestHandler
Return value is as follows:
response
+lst name=responseHeader/lst
+result name=response numFound=9859 start=0
maxScore=8.034911/result
+lst name=highlighting/lst
/response
response has just url list of results. highlighting has title, url and
content of results
Apologies for the mistake. Will always take care of it.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 6:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting fields
Please do not use an existing message thread for another
Are the fields you are trying to highlight stored?
If yes then can you show the exact query you are using? Which version of solr?
And which highlighter? ( you can paste the relevant highlight section from solr
config file)
--
Shreejay
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 at 22:56, Sagar Chaturvedi
-Original Message-
From: Sagar Chaturvedi
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Highlighting fields
Sorry for wrong subject. Corrected it.
-Original Message-
From: Sagar Chaturvedi [mailto:sagar.chaturv...@nectechnologies.in]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013
Please do not respond to hijacked message threads, other than to encourage
the sender to start a new message thread.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shreejay
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting fields
-
From: Shreejay
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting fields
Are the fields you are trying to highlight stored?
If yes then can you show the exact query you are using? Which version of
solr? And which highlighter? ( you can paste
Sorry for wrong subject. Corrected it.
-Original Message-
From: Sagar Chaturvedi [mailto:sagar.chaturv...@nectechnologies.in]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 11:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Support for Mongolian language
Hi,
On solr admin UI, in a query I am trying to
Hi all,
accoridng to this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2998
Are there any plans to fix this bug? Is there antoher way to usign fvh
and still having proper results (without concatenation)?
--
Karol Sikora
+48 781 493 788
Laboratorium EE
ul. Mokotowska 46A/23 | 00-543
I'm having issues with highlighting DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory
in Solr 3.6.1/3.6.2.
It's duplicating/adding words in the highlighted snippet. For example, my
dictionary (dutch) has the following words: premie, beter, ring.
If I search for 'verbetering', results
Just to clarify this question a little, if I search for the term specificato
and designate highlighting (hl=true) then my highlighting comes back fine.
If I search for something else, designate highlighting and attach a different
query to it (hl.q=specificato) then I do not always get good
..32
ANEXOS A Formas verbales (normativo
Which is a bit of a problem, is there any way I can get rid of this dots? Is
there any sort of relevance in the snippets that the highlighting components
returns? I mean in this particular case, the snippet came from the index page
of the PDF which
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Getting better snippets in highlighting component
Hi all:
I'm building a document search plattform, basically indexing a lot of PDF
files. Some of this files has an index, which means that when I query for
normativos in my application (built using
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Enviados: Sábado, 30 de Marzo 2013 0:40:03
Asunto: Re: Getting better snippets in highlighting component
It looks like a table of contents. The dots are followed by the page number,
followed by the text from the next table of contents entry, and repeat.
Even
For those interested I believe this is an issue of what is in the index is
not what I expected. I believe that we've tracked down the issue, please
ignore the question.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
Some time ago I had worked with a fellow developer
Some time ago I had worked with a fellow developer to put together an addon
to the (then) current Solr Highlighter to support fetching fields from an
external source (like a database for instance). The general mechanics seem
to work properly but I am seeing issues now where the highlights do not
that talks about vehicles/str
when i search for car and have the hit highlighting turned on , this
document appears in the results, but the highlighted fragment is only car.
Even though i change the fl.fragment to a maximum number without any luck.
I know the results returned is correct but i just
What field are you doing your hit highlighting on? You need to look at
the configuration for the highlighting component in solrconfig.xml. Also
note that you can only highlight on *stored* fields. The 'text' field is
by default not stored, so you'd need to change that and re-index.
Upayavira
as multivalues and concatenate it to achieve my requirement. Is there a
better way to do this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLRCloud-dynamic-teaser-hit-highlighting-tp4048930p4048937.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
to make sure it does not
add
them as multivalues and concatenate it to achieve my requirement. Is
there a
better way to do this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLRCloud-dynamic-teaser-hit-highlighting-tp4048930p4048937.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi all,
I have problems with the higlighting mechanism:
The query is:
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/mpiwgweb/select?facet=truefacet.field=descriptionfacet.field=langfacet.field=main_contentstart=0q=meier+AND+%28description:member+OR+description:project%29
after that:
In the field main_content
Betreff: Highlighting problems
Hi all,
I have problems with the higlighting mechanism:
The query is:
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/mpiwgweb/select?facet=truefacet.field=descriptionfacet.field=langfacet.field=main_contentstart=0q=meier+AND+%28description:member+OR+description:project%29
after
Hi Andre,
thanks this did the job. I also had to enable edismax and set the default
parameter there - otherwise no highlighting at all.
Best
Dirk
Am 11.03.2013 um 13:59 schrieb André Widhani andre.widh...@digicol.de:
Hi Dirk,
please check
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
: I have highlighting working for a generic text field, but cannot get it
: to work for a field which contains raw data.
...
: hl.fl=rawData
...
: fieldType name=raw class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
You've shown us how the the fieldType named raw is declared
Hello,
when i set term vector on, it will return information of all the words in
document.
i have highlighting on also.
i want to get term vector information of only those words which are there in
highlighting fragment.
how to do that?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene
Does anyone have any ideas? I don't understand how the query can match, as I am
querying against the same field, and yet get zero highlighting occurring.
Just to clarify, this query, against a field called rawData returns 51 hits for
me:
?q=Working%20sheet%20numbers%20and%20names
qf=rawData
zero highlighting
occurring.
Just to clarify, this query, against a field called rawData returns 51
hits for me:
?q=Working%20sheet%20numbers%20and%20names
qf=rawData
fl=*,score
defType=edismax
hl=true
hl.fl=rawData
hl.simple.pre=BBB
hl.simple.post=EEE
hl.fragsize=10
hl.snippets
=*
defType=edismax
hl=true
hl.fl=text_exact
hl.simple.pre=BBB
hl.simple.post=EEE
hl.fragsize=10
hl.snippets=1000
The highlighting comes back as tokenized, however:
arr name=text_exact
strBBBCreatesEEE a BBBnewEEE BBBlayerEEE./str
/arr
I would have expected it to look like this:
arr name=text_exact
in the link above.
Thanks in advance! :)
/tuxdna
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-search-Tika-extracted-text-from-PDF-not-return-highlighting-snippet-tp3999647p4041180.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
The alternateField and maxAlternateFieldLength params work well, but only as
long as the alternate field actually exists for the document. If it does not,
highlighting returns nothing.
We would like this behavior
1. Highlighting in body if matches
2. Fallback to verbatim teaser
Subject: Highlighting: When alternateField does not exist
Hi,
The alternateField and maxAlternateFieldLength params work well, but only as
long as the alternate field actually exists for the document. If it does not,
highlighting returns nothing.
We would like this behavior
1
Hi,
I would like to store the document content into a single special field (non
indexed, stored only), and create several indexed copy fields (different
analysis applied).
During highlighting, the analysis definitions of the stored field are used,
so that improper or no highlighting is done
attempted to highlight a field that is not stored in Solr?
We have been considering not storing fields in Solr, but still would like
to use Solr's built-in highlighting. On first glance, it looks like it
would be fairly simply to modify DefaultSolrHighlighter to get the stored
fields from
.nabble.com/Highlighting-data-stored-outside-of-Solr-tp4026144p4026971.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have a solr query where I search for (webpage_text:*test* OR
company_text:*test*)
In my highlighting I set my fields to webpage_text, company_text. But now I
always get BOTH fields in the highlighting result, even when the search term
is only found in webpage_text, I also get a highlight result
and finally doc.vm as follows:
div #field('boletim') de $date.format(dd/MM/,
$doc.getFieldValue('data')) #field('url') /div
#if ($params.get('q').trim().length() 0)
div#field('conteudo')/div
#end
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/highlighting
I forgot to mention that the field that I wished to have multiple occurences
shown is the field named conteudo
I am already trying to make it iterate but up to now with no succes...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/highlighting-multiple-occurrences
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/highlighting-multiple-occurrences-tp4025715p4026057.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Did it as suggested in the link I sent
tks a lot!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/highlighting-multiple-occurrences-tp4025715p4026063.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Has anyone ever attempted to highlight a field that is not stored in Solr? We
have been considering not storing fields in Solr, but still would like to use
Solr's built-in highlighting. On first glance, it looks like it would be
fairly simply to modify DefaultSolrHighlighter to get the stored
that is not stored in Solr?
We have been considering not storing fields in Solr, but still would like
to use Solr's built-in highlighting. On first glance, it looks like it
would be fairly simply to modify DefaultSolrHighlighter to get the stored
fields from an external source. We already do not use
Hi all,
I have a solr instance with one field configured for highlighting as
follows:
str name=hlon/str
str name=hl.flconteudo/str
str name=hl.fragsize500/str
str name=hl.maxAnalyzedChars9/str
str name=hl.simple.prelt;font style=background-color:
yellowgt;/str
but I was willing
Did you mean that you want multiple snippets?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.snippets
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Ribeiro [mailto:rafae...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: highlighting multiple
no
difference at all.
Do I have to change anything else? For example, something on the velocity
template???
best regards,
Rafael
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/highlighting-multiple-occurrences-tp4025715p4025771.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
, 2012 2:26 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: highlighting multiple occurrences
yep!
I tried enabling this and settings various values bot no success... still it
only shows the first fragment of the search found...
I also saw this
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/hl-snippets
Hello,
I prefer individual fields because this allows one to apply different query
boosting and other nice (e)dismax things on different fields. With a
catch-all field you lose that. Yes, to have highlighting you need to store
fields you want to use for highlighting.
See http://search
because this allows one to apply different
query boosting and other nice (e)dismax things on different fields. With a
catch-all field you lose that. Yes, to have highlighting you need to store
fields you want to use for highlighting.
See http://search-lucene.com/?q=solr+catchall+%22catch+all%22
Hi, all.
The content I'm trying to index contains dollar signs that should be
indexed and matched, e.g., $1.
I've set up my schema to index the dollar sign, and am able to successfully
match it with the query analyzer; searching for $1 matches $1.
However, the highlighter doesn't seem to
Hi,
I was wondering if it is possible to set up highlighting so it is on by
default, and doesnt need to add to the URL. For example:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=bookhl=true
I would like to have it so highlighting is on even if the URL is this:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q
401 - 500 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
