or single quote, only escape ! or escape all { and !, nothing
will make it work.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-efficiently-get-sum-of-an-int-field-tp4238464p4238478.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/solr/413-2=true={!sum=true}myfieldname'
> http://localhost:8080/solr/413-1/select/? | xmllint --format -
>
> double quote or single quote, only escape ! or escape all { and !, nothing
> will make it work.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.
/mean etc are the ones that caused the time.
Is there a simple way I can just get the sum without other things, and run
it on a faster and less stressed to the solr server manner?
Thanks
Renee
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-efficiently-get-sum
max/mean etc are the ones that caused the time.
>
> Is there a simple way I can just get the sum without other things, and run
> it on a faster and less stressed to the solr server manner?
>
> Thanks
> Renee
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472
I did try single quote with backslash of the bang.
also tried disable history chars...
did not work for me.
unfortunately, we are using solr 3.5, probably does not support json format?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-efficiently-get-sum-of-an-int
: =true=my_field_name=0
...
: I noticed the 'stats' give out more information than I needed (just sum), I
: suspect the min/max/mean etc are the ones that caused the time.
:
: Is there a simple way I can just get the sum without other things, and run
: it on a faster and less stressed to
memory overhead, is
that implemented so ?
anyways I was only trying to avoid running these stats on thousands
customers that kills our solr servers.
thanks
Renee
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-efficiently-get-sum-of-an-int-field-tp4238464p4238520.html
now I think with solr 3.5 (that we are using), !sum=true (overwrite default )
probably is not supported yet :-(
thanks
Renee
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-efficiently-get-sum-of-an-int-field-tp4238464p4238519.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Renee Sun wrote:
> Also Yonik, out of curiosity... when I run stats on a large msg set (such as
> 200 million msgs), it tends to use a lot of memory, this should be expected
> correct?
With the stats component, yeah.
> if I were able to use
thanks Yonik... I bet with solr 3.5 we do not have jason facet api support
yet ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-efficiently-get-sum-of-an-int-field-tp4238464p4238522.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Renee Sun wrote:
: > Also Yonik, out of curiosity... when I run stats on a large msg set (such as
: > 200 million msgs), it tends to use a lot of memory, this should be expected
: > correct?
:
: With the stats component, yeah.
the amount
11 matches
Mail list logo