short circuit since we have dups :-( based on a
historical reason.
any suggestion how to make this more efficiently?
thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-any-way-to-tell-delete-by-query-actually-deleted-anything-tp4226776p4226788.html
Sent from
On 9/2/2015 1:30 PM, Renee Sun wrote:
> Is there an easy way for me to get the actually deleted document number? I
> mean if the query did not hit any documents, I want to know that nothing got
> deleted. But if it did hit documents, i would like to know how many were
> delete...
I do this by
number? I
mean if the query did not hit any documents, I want to know that nothing got
deleted. But if it did hit documents, i would like to know how many were
delete...
thanks
Renee
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-any-way-to-tell-delete-by-query
if the query did not hit any documents, I want to know that nothing
> got
> deleted. But if it did hit documents, i would like to know how many were
> delete...
>
> thanks
> Renee
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nab
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-any-way-to-tell-delete-by-query-actually-deleted-anything-tp4226776p4226788.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
I mean to ask: is there any solr admin meta data I can fetch through restful
api, to get data such as index last updated time, or something like that?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-any-way-to-tell-delete-by-query-actually-deleted-anything
Hi Erick... as Shawn pointed out... I am not using solrcloud, I am using a
more complicated sharding scheme, home grown...
thanks for your response :-)
Renee
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-any-way-to-tell-delete-by-query-actually-deleted-anything
-delete-by-query-actually-deleted-anything-tp4226776p4226805.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 9/2/2015 3:32 PM, Renee Sun wrote:
> I think we have similar structure where we use frontier/back instead of
> hot/cold :-)
>
> so yes we will probably have to do the same.
>
> since we have large customers and some of them may have tera bytes data and
> end up with hundreds of cold cores
On 9/2/2015 2:24 PM, Renee Sun wrote:
> I have a sharded index. When I re-index a document (vs new index, which is
> different process), I need to delete the old one first to avoid dup. We all
> know that if there is only one core, the newly added document will replace
> the old one, but with
10 matches
Mail list logo
