Hi,
Is there a way to select text fields in a query with a join clause in
Streaming Expressions or Parallel SQL? The following query:
SELECT field_s, field_t FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 ON t1.a = t2.a LIMIT 10
requires that field_t, which is of type text, have docValues enabled, which
is not supported
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Nancy Goyal <87.na...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have implemented basic SOLR Joins between two collections. Currently in
> my project implementation, we are getting data from multiple tables and
> storing as single document in view an
Hi,
I have implemented basic SOLR Joins between two collections. Currently in
my project implementation, we are getting data from multiple tables and
storing as single document in view and indexing that view. We got a
suggestion to implement the same with Joins but not sure if the same
This is my pet peeve in Solr.
When q={!join ..}all tokens goes into join qp
but even if we put space in front of curly brace q= {!join
..}1st_only_token_goes_to_join_qp
I remember there were some discussion in comments, but I believe it is not
raised ever raised as a defect.
We have some json query
Am 23.11.17 um 20:13 schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
Hello, David.
It should be like
q=name:"Mike" AND {!join from=pid to=id v=$qq}&qq=city:"London" AND id:"a1"
Thanks a lot!
But this looks like working around a bug, given that
>> {!join from=pid to=id}(city:"London" AND id:"a1")
works fine. Is t
Hello, David.
It should be like
q=name:"Mike" AND {!join from=pid to=id v=$qq}&qq=city:"London" AND id:"a1"
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:06 PM, David Frese
wrote:
> Hi there everbody,
>
> I want to combine joins with multiple criteria and other criteri
Hi there everbody,
I want to combine joins with multiple criteria and other criteria, with
variying boolean operators, but I keep getting
"org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Cannot parse" errors. I tried with
an installation of version 6.3, and also with the embedded server in
v
e down why you are getting the results you are.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Сергей Твердохлеб wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have two joins and I need to link them using OR statement.
>
> The first one is
>
>> fq={!join fromIndex=master_Category_flip
Hi all,
I have two joins and I need to link them using OR statement.
The first one is
> fq={!join fromIndex=master_Category_flip from=manufactureName_string
> to=nameString_string}visibility_string_mv:"Test_B2BUnit" AND
> itemtype_string:"Model"
which returns resu
apability? What part of
> developer documentation would be suitable for this?
>
> Regards,
> Imran
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Joel Bernstein
> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 7:40 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Joins in Parallel SQ
Is it possible to contribute towards building this capability? What part of
developer documentation would be suitable for this?
Regards,
Imran
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Joel Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 7:40 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Joins in Parallel
Joins and OFFSET are not currently supported with Parallel SQL.
The docs for parallel SQL cover all the supported features. Any syntax not
covered in the docs is likely not supported.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:40 PM, wrote:
>
> Is it possi
Is it possible to join documents from different collections through Parallel
SQL?
In addition to the LIMIT feature on Parallel SQL, can we do use OFFSET to
implement paging?
Thanks,
Imran
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
.
So just curious whether graph works for you and can you share me your sample
data and query you use to traverse the graph?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Joins-using-graph-queries-solr-6-0-tp4336214p4336455.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hi - We are having a tree based structure in solr and we are using solr graph
queries to perform some search in our usecases. Example - {! graph from=xx
to=yy} we got a new requirement like we need to search last level nodes based
on some parents in the tree and those last level nodes needs to b
I was able to implement one join (https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join) in my
query but I couldn't find the correct syntax to use multiple joins... is
that possible? Could someone please give me some example?
Thanks!
roject_uuid to=id v=$q1} OR {!join
> from=project_uuid to=id v=$q2}
> &q1=type:EM_PM_Timerecord AND
> created:[2015-01-01T01:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T01:00:00Z]
> &q2=type:EM_CM_Request_Member AND
> created:[2015-01-01T01:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T01:00:00Z]
>
> -Yonik
Thank you, this works great.
Mathias
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/OR-two-joins-tp4302415p4302455.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Mathias
wrote:
> With the first version I get the fallowing error:
>
> "org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Cannot parse '(type:EM_PM_Timerecord':
> Encountered \"\" at line 1, column 22.\nWas expecting one of:\n
> ...\n ...\n ...\n\"+\" ...\n\"-\"
...\n
...\n\"(\" ...\n\")\" ...\n\"*\" ...\n\"^\" ...\n
...\n ...\n ...\n ...\n
...\n ...\n\"[\" ...\n\"{\" ...\n
...\n\"filter(\" ...\n ...\n"
With the second version
7;t return any documents, but if I use only one of the joins e.g.:
>
> {!join from=project_uuid to=id}type:EM_PM_Timerecord AND
> created:[2015-01-01T01:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T01:00:00Z]
>
> It returns some documents.
>
> If I remove the date ranges it works as well:
>
> ({
I tested it with solr version 6.1.0 and 6.2.1.
Thanks,
Mathias
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/OR-two-joins-tp4302415p4302416.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
n any documents, but if I use only one of the joins e.g.:
{!join from=project_uuid to=id}type:EM_PM_Timerecord AND
created:[2015-01-01T01:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T01:00:00Z]
It returns some documents.
If I remove the date ranges it works as well:
({!join from=project_uuid to=id}type:EM_PM_Timerecor
hashJoins and mergeJoins in streaming expressions. If it
doesn't say hash in the function name than it's a merge join.
The merge joins require the underlying streams be sorted by the join keys.
The hashJoins do not require specific sorts.
This is an important distinction if you need to gro
Hello all,
I am exploring one of Solr 6.2 new feature (stream decorators) for one of
my application and the "leftOuterJoin" is working as expected. (joining two
streams and getting the data from both the collections)
I need to know if group query works with these distributed joins or
Hi,
Parallel SQL does not yet support joins but Streaming Expressions does.
There are 4 types of aggregations in Streaming Expression currently. The
functions are:
facet: group by aggregations pushed down to the JSON facet API. Will not
work with joins.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
Hello,
I'm exploring the Parallel SQL. I don't see any SQL JOIN features available in
the parallel SQL interface, in the documentation. Is it even possible to do SQL
JOIN in the parallel SQL interface?
Was looking at streaming expression but looks like facets are not possible with
it. Not even
e state I'm looking for. With all other filters applied,
> the total result set is around 5000 documents. The query takes around 10
> seconds.
>
> After reading up on how Joins are essentially just subqueries, I understand
> why my original approach would be slow. However,
Interviews in the state I'm looking for. With all other filters applied,
the total result set is around 5000 documents. The query takes around 10
seconds.
After reading up on how Joins are essentially just subqueries, I understand
why my original approach would be slow. However, whe
t java.io.OutputStream.write(OutputStream.java:116)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.writeBytes(StreamEncoder.java:221)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.implWrite(StreamEncoder.java:282)
> > > >
amWriter.write(OutputStreamWriter.java:207)
> > >>>
> > >>> at org.apache.solr.util.FastWriter.flush(FastWriter.java:140)
> > >>>
> > >>> at org.apache.solr.util.FastWriter.write(FastWriter.java:54)
> > >>>
> > &
.java:420)
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache.solr.response.JSONWriter.writeSolrDocument(JSONResponseWriter.java:364)
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache
.writeVal(TextResponseWriter.java:150)
>>>
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.solr.response.JSONWriter.writeNamedListAsMapWithDups(JSONResponseWriter.java:183)
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Joel Bernstein
>>> wrote:
>>&
ues for the fields for sorting and
>> > exporting.
>> >
>> > Breaking down the query into it's parts will show where the issue is.
>> Also
>> > adding more heap might give you enough memory.
>> >
>> > In my testing the max docs
> >
> > In my testing the max docs per second I've seen the /export handler push
> > from a single node is 650,000. In order to get 650,000 docs per second on
> > one node you have to partition the stream with workers. In my testing it
> > took 8 workers hitting one node to
ers, you could export 52,000,000 docs per-second. With 40
> shards, 5 replicas and 40 workers you could export 130,000,000 docs per
> second.
>
> So with large clusters you could do very large distributed joins with
> sub-second performance.
>
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
>
ou could export 130,000,000 docs per
second.
So with large clusters you could do very large distributed joins with
sub-second performance.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Ryan Cutter wrote:
> Thanks very much for the advice. Yes, I'm
) Then try the full thing.
>
> If you're running a large join like this all on one host then you might not
> have enough memory for the docValues and the two joins. In general
> streaming is designed to scale by adding servers. It scales 3 ways:
>
> 1) Adding shards, splits
running a large join like this all on one host then you might not
have enough memory for the docValues and the two joins. In general
streaming is designed to scale by adding servers. It scales 3 ways:
1) Adding shards, splits up the index for more pushing power.
2) Adding workers, partitions the str
erJoin can parallelized across workers to improve performance.
> Take a look at the docs on the parallel function for the details.
>
> 2) It looks like you might be doing graph operations with joins. You might
> to take a look at the gatherNodes function coming in 6.1:
>
> ht
A couple of other things:
1) Your innerJoin can parallelized across workers to improve performance.
Take a look at the docs on the parallel function for the details.
2) It looks like you might be doing graph operations with joins. You might
to take a look at the gatherNodes function coming in
When doing things that require all the results (like joins) you need to
specify the /export handler in the search function.
qt="/export"
The search function defaults to the /select handler which is designed to
return the top N results. The /export handler always returns all results
Question #1:
triple_type collection has a few hundred docs and triple has 25M docs.
When I search for a particular subject_id in triple which I know has 14
results and do not pass in 'rows' params, it returns 0 results:
innerJoin(
search(triple, q=subject_id:1656521, fl="triple_id,subject_id
s been added to searches so that
results with the same userId are shuffled to the same worker node.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Dennis Gove wrote:
> Mugeesh,
>
> You can use Streaming Aggregation to provide various types of
> cross-c
but that is not a requirement.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Dennis Gove wrote:
> Mugeesh,
>
> You can use Streaming Aggregation to provide various types of
> cross-collection joins. This is currently available in trunk and will be a
> part of Solr 6.
>
> To follow wit
Mugeesh,
You can use Streaming Aggregation to provide various types of
cross-collection joins. This is currently available in trunk and will be a
part of Solr 6.
To follow with your example, let's assume the following setup:
Restaurants: avail on machine1:8983 with 3 shards, zk at zk1:2345
.
Client: is not interested to de-normalized data.
Give some suggestion how to solved that problem.
Thanks
Mugeesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Joins-with-SolrCloud-tp4243957.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
exed.
>
> What do I want to achieve? The Block Joins we have been discussing were
> giving me scores of 0.0, and I would like to get something a wee bit better
> than that (not looking for accuracy yet).
>
> In the query below, I got some scores by putting {!score in the paren
Hi Mikhail
Sorry, I should have noted "that" is a word in the OCR text that I have
indexed.
What do I want to achieve? The Block Joins we have been discussing were
giving me scores of 0.0, and I would like to get something a wee bit better
than that (not looking for accuracy yet).
In
Rick,
fl=score,[child parentFilter=type_s:book childFilter=*{!score=avg}*that],
This childFilter value doesn't make sense. What do yo want to achieve?
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Rick Leir wrote:
> Hi all,
> Scoring is confusing me. Is the following correct?
>
> $ curl http://localhost:898
Hi all,
Scoring is confusing me. Is the following correct?
$ curl http://localhost:8983/solr/dorsetdata/query -d '
q={!parent which="content_type:parentDocument" *score=max*} type_s:page AND
that&
wt=json&indent=true&
fl=score,[child parentFilter=type_s:book childFilter=*{!score=avg}*that
],canoni
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:47 PM,
wrote:
>
> I'd happy that it helps. You need to thank Varun who made [child]. There is
> no performance impact for sure, it's a compromise or either nobody
> considered it as an issue. You can raise a new JIRA and describe how it
> should work in general and make
ND charlie&
> wt=json&indent=true&
> fl=score,[child parentFilter=type_s:book childFilter="charlie"
> ],canonicalMaster,title,publisher,[docid]'
>
> Cheers -- Rick
>
> Re: Block Joins
> > 118348 by: Rick Leir
> > 118349 by:
nt"} type_s:page AND charlie&
wt=json&indent=true&
fl=score,[child parentFilter=type_s:book childFilter="charlie"
],canonicalMaster,title,publisher,[docid]'
Cheers -- Rick
Re: Block Joins
> 118348 by: Rick Leir
> 118349 by: Mikhail Khludnev
&g
Hello Rick,
If I got you right, it's worth to have a look at [child]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Transforming+Result+Documents
Let me know if it works.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Rick Leir
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am new to Block Joins, and am trying to follo
Hi all,
I am new to Block Joins, and am trying to follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-BlockJoinQueryParsers
This page shows two forms of block join
syntax for this parser q={!child of=}.
example queryq={!child
of
The question as I read it was composite documents, not cross-collection
joins.
If the joined core is small enough to be replicated across all replicas
of your main collection, then cross-core joining works well, as it is
all within one instance.
As to composite documents, I have sometimes
True, I haven't looked at it closely. Not sure where it is in the
priority list though.
However, I would recommend you _really_ look at _why_ you
think you need cross-collection joins. Likely they will be expensive,
and whether they're performant in your situation will be a question.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7090
I see this jira open in support of joins which might solve the problem.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> bq: Is there any chance of this feature(merge the results to create a
> composite
> document) coming out in
e:
>
>> You can do what are called "pseudo joins", which are eqivalent to a
>> nested query in SQL. You get back data from one core, based upon
>> criteria in the other. You cannot (yet) merge the results to create a
>> composite document.
>>
>> Upayavi
Is there any chance of this feature(merge the results to create a composite
document) coming out in the next release 5.3 ?
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> You can do what are called "pseudo joins", which are eqivalent to a
> nested query in SQL. You get ba
You can do what are called "pseudo joins", which are eqivalent to a
nested query in SQL. You get back data from one core, based upon
criteria in the other. You cannot (yet) merge the results to create a
composite document.
Upayavira
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015, at 06:02 PM, Nagasharath
I exactly have the same requirement
> On 13-Aug-2015, at 2:12 pm, Kiran Sai Veerubhotla wrote:
>
> does solr support joins?
>
> we have a use case where two collections have to be joined and the join has
> to be on the faceted results of the two collections. is this possible?
does solr support joins?
we have a use case where two collections have to be joined and the join has
to be on the faceted results of the two collections. is this possible?
You can potentially just use a text_general field, in which case your
comma separated words will be effectively a multi-valued field. I
believe that will work.
As to how you want to use joins, that isn't possible. They are pseudo
joins, not full joins. They will not be able to include data
Hi,
We have some master data and some content data. Master data would be things
like userid, name, email id etc.
Our content data for example is a blog.
The blog has certain fields which are comma separated ids that point to the
master data.
E.g. UserIDs of people who have commented on a particu
Hi,
We have some master data and some content data. Master data would be things
like userid, name, email id etc.
Our content data for example is a blog.
The blog has certain fields which are comma separated ids that point to the
master data.
E.g. UserIDs of people who have commented on a particu
Excuse me for hijacking: I raised
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6332. Please vote if you need.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Matt B wrote:
> I've recently inherited a Solr instance that is required to perform
> numerous joins between two cores, usually as fil
a try for this join contrib patch
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4787
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Matt B wrote:
> >
> > > I've recently inherited a Solr instance that is required to perform
> > &g
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Matt B wrote:
> There may be anywhere from one to one million documents in the lists core
> matching any particular list_id.
Matt,
What about reverse cardinality of this relation? ie for particular
listValue term, how many list_ids are associated? it's can be f
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Matt B wrote:
>
> > I've recently inherited a Solr instance that is required to perform
> > numerous joins between two cores, usually as filter queries, similar to
> the
> > one below:
> >
> > q=firstName=Matt&a
You could give a try for this join contrib patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4787
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Matt B wrote:
> I've recently inherited a Solr instance that is required to perform
> numerous joins between two cores, usually as filter queries, sim
I've recently inherited a Solr instance that is required to perform numerous
joins between two cores, usually as filter queries, similar to the one below:
q=firstName=Matt&fq=-({!to=emailAddress toIndex=accounts type=join
fromIndex=lists from=listValue}list_id:38f2-351b-
I am curious why you are trying to do this with Solr. This is straightforward
with other systems. I would use HBase for this. This could be really hard with
Solr.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Nov 5, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Steve Davids wrote:
> I
I have a use-case where I would like to capture click events for individual
users so I can answer questions like show me everything with x text and
that I have clicked before + the inverse of show me everything with x text
that I have *not* clicked. I am currently doing this by sticking the event
i
Hello,
Did you look into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6234 ?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Eric Katherman wrote:
> Is it possible to join documents and use a field from the "from" documents
> to sort the results? For example, I need to search "employees" and sort on
> differe
Is it possible to join documents and use a field from the "from"
documents to sort the results? For example, I need to search
"employees" and sort on different fields of the "company" each employee
is joined to. What would that query look like? We've looked at various
resources but haven't f
e:parent}q )
So is it possible to return the snippets based on the query in the parent?
Do I need to tweak the code for this? Or is there an open isssue and thus
work in progress?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-Block-Joins-tp4153165.html
Sent fro
Yup, that's known, added it for future Solr releases. But seems this couldn't
be a reason for such results discrepancy.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-results-inconsistency-when-using-joins-tp4149810p4149925.html
Sent from the Solr - Us
The join qparser has no "fq" parameter, so that is ignored.
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - native code faceting, facet functions,
sub-facets, off-heap data
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:12 PM, heaven wrote:
> _query_:"{!join from=profile_ids_im to=id_i v=$qTweet107001860
> fq=$fqTweet107001860
Just tried to remove joins and it worked as expected:
q: (
_query_:"{!edismax qf='name_small_ngram' mm='1'}-foundation -association
-organization -hospital -charity -news -info"
AND (
_query_:"{!edismax qf='name_small_ngram emails_words_ngra
ords_text' mm='1'}+diabetes""
fqTweet106902440: "type:Tweet"
qTweet106961560: "_query_:"{!edismax qf='keywords_text' mm='1'}+insulin""
fqTweet106961560: "type:Tweet"
qTweet107001860: "_query_:"{!edismax qf='keywords_text' mm='1'}+glucose""
fqTweet107001860: "type:Tweet"
=> 1,036 matches
But the last one gives almost 2 times more.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thank you,
Alexander
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-results-inconsistency-when-using-joins-tp4149810.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank You, Umesh !
That's a neat approach. Reading through your post, we decided to tweak our
indexing strategy a bit, basically an inversion. We moved all our facetable
(and frequently updated) fields to the main doc and the text and other
static content fields to the sub doc (co-related via a pa
Hi Vinay,
You can customize the FacetsComponent. Basically FacetComponent uses
SimpleFacets to compute the facet count. It passes matched docset present
in responsebuilder to SimpleFacets's constructor.
1. Build a mapping between parent space and auxiliary document space in
(say an int array) a
Some Background info :
In our application, we have a requirement to update large number of records
often. I investigated solr child documents but it requires updating both
the child and the parent document . Therefore, I'm investigating adding
frequently updated information in an "auxillary docume
omotive-Service-Solutions) wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am facing a strange behavior with the Solr Server. All my joins are not
>> working suddenly after a restart. Individual collections are returning the
>> response but when I join the collection , I am getting zero do
Send the queries.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:32 PM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI,
Automotive-Service-Solutions) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am facing a strange behavior with the Solr Server. All my joins are not
> working suddenly after a restart. Individual collections are returning th
Hi All,
I am facing a strange behavior with the Solr Server. All my joins are not
working suddenly after a restart. Individual collections are returning the
response but when I join the collection , I am getting zero documents. Let me
know if anyone have same type of issues.
Any suggestions?
Zitat von m...@preselect-media.com:
Hello,
I'm using eDisMax to do scoring for my search results.
I have a nested structure of documents. The main (parent) document
with meta data and the child documents with fulltext content. So I
have to join them.
My qf looks like th
Hello,
I'm using eDisMax to do scoring for my search results.
I have a nested structure of documents. The main (parent) document
with meta data and the child documents with fulltext content. So I
have to join them.
My qf looks like this "title^40.0 subtitle^40.0 original_title^10.0
keywor
> Also, if you can please elaborate on the segmented vs toplevel
>
http://vimeo.com/44113003
"Is Your Index Reader Really Atomic or Maybe Slow?" by Uwe Schindler
> Thanks,
>
> Anand
>
>
>
> On 2/7/2014 4:53 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
>> Basicall
Thanks Mikhail, curious why was scoring left out of solr ? And if
there's any plan to port it ?
Also, if you can please elaborate on the segmented vs toplevel
Thanks,
Anand
On 2/7/2014 4:53 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Basically, i am trying to understand where and how solr joins d
>> Basically, i am trying to understand where and how solr joins differ from
>> lucene joins. Any pointers, much appreciated ?
>>
>>
Hello Anand,
I'm keen for index-time joins (aka block joins), thus I've never looked
into query-time ones.
I even didn't
e limitation of solr
join,does it means that unlike the traditional RDMS joins that can
have columns from both the TO and FROM field, solr joins will only
have fields from the TO documents ? Is my understanding correct ?
Also, there's some difference with respect to scoring and towards that
t
uments
(ie: you can not return fields in the "from" documents as if they were a
multivalued field on the "to" documents)".
I am finding it hard to understand the above limitation of solr
join,does it means that unlike the traditional RDMS joins that can have
columns fr
ou can not return fields in the "from" documents as if they were a
multivalued field on the "to" documents)".
I am finding it hard to understand the above limitation of solr
join,does it means that unlike the traditional RDMS joins that can have
columns from both the TO an
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:30 AM, William Bell wrote:
> OK,
>
> In order to do boosting, we often will create a dynamic field in SOLR. For
> example:
>
> A Professional hire out for work, I want to boost those who do
> "woodworking".
>
> George Smith - builds chairs, and builds desks. He builds th
Have you seen this one:
http://hnagtech.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/using-payloads-with-solr-4-x/
?
Also, I can't tell where the "woodworking" as a term actually comes
from. Maybe a bit more domain description would help.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: h
Ideas?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:10 AM, William Bell wrote:
> Is there an example for using payloads for 4.6?
>
> Without any custom code for this?
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:30 PM, William Bell wrote:
>
>> OK,
>>
>> In order to do boosting, we often will create a dynamic field in SOLR.
Is there an example for using payloads for 4.6?
Without any custom code for this?
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:30 PM, William Bell wrote:
> OK,
>
> In order to do boosting, we often will create a dynamic field in SOLR. For
> example:
>
> A Professional hire out for work, I want to boost those wh
OK,
In order to do boosting, we often will create a dynamic field in SOLR. For
example:
A Professional hire out for work, I want to boost those who do
"woodworking".
George Smith - builds chairs, and builds desks. He builds the most desks in
the country (350 a year). And his closest competitor d
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
