27; (numeric).
> Searching without wildcard also returns zero results...
>
> As I mentioned before: we are testing this all, so we are not really up to
> speed with the why-does-this-do-that, although I am trying to learn.
>
> Thanks for any other pointers you can provide.
> Gr
l Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 16 maart 2018 17:08
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: question regarding wildcard-searches
If you goal is to search prefixes only, I'd go away from the _text_ field all
together and use a "string" type. This wil
gt;>
>> Unfortunately that also gives no results (and it would not be practical, as
>> for this example the numbering only goes up till 19 but others go up into
>> the thousands etc)
>>
>> Anybody with a pointer on this?
>>
>> Thanks already,
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jagdish vasani [mailto:jagdisht.vas...@gmail.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 16 maart 2018 12:41
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: question regarding wildcard-searches
>
> Hi paesen,
>
> Value - EO.1954.53.1 is indexed
[mailto:jagdisht.vas...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 16 maart 2018 12:41
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: question regarding wildcard-searches
Hi paesen,
Value - EO.1954.53.1 is indexed as below Eo
1954
53
1
Dot is removed.try with wildcard -?
Like EO.1954.53.?? If you have 2 digits only in last..
I have
Hi paesen,
Value - EO.1954.53.1 is indexed as below
Eo
1954
53
1
Dot is removed.try with wildcard -?
Like EO.1954.53.?? If you have 2 digits only in last..
I have not tried but you just check it.
Hope it will solve your problem.
Thanks,
Jagdish
On 16-Mar-2018 3:51 pm, "Paesen Roel" wrote:
> Hi
Hi everybody,
We are experimenting with solr, and I have a (I think) basic-level question:
we have a multiple fields, all copied into a generic field so we can search
everything at once.
However we have a (for us) strange situation doing wildcard searches for the
contents of one specific field.
