On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : 1. "omitTermFreqAndPositions" is very straightforward but if I avoid
> : positions I'll refuse to serve phrase queries. I had searched for this in
>
> but do you really need phrase queries on your "cat" field? i thought the
> point wa
: 1. "omitTermFreqAndPositions" is very straightforward but if I avoid
: positions I'll refuse to serve phrase queries. I had searched for this in
but do you really need phrase queries on your "cat" field? i thought the
point was to have simple matching on those terms?
: 2. Function query se
: 1. "omitTermFreqAndPositions" is very straightforward but if I avoid
: positions I'll refuse to serve phrase queries. I had searched for this in
but do you really need phrase queries on your "cat" field? i thought the
point was to have simple matching on those terms?
: 2. Function query se
No solutions to the problem?
OK. I'll look for the changes in source code and if I succeed I'll share it
here for feedback.
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Samarendra Pratap wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> Thanks for the insight.
>
> 1. "omitTermFreqAndPositions" is very straightforward but if I
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the insight.
1. "omitTermFreqAndPositions" is very straightforward but if I avoid
positions I'll refuse to serve phrase queries. I had searched for this in
past as well but I finally reached to the conclusion that there is no thing
like "omitTermFreq" (only). Perhaps because
: You can write your custom similarity implementation, and override the
: /lengthNorm()/ method to return a constant value.
The postered already said (twice!) that they have already set
omitNorms=true, so lengthNorm won't even be used
omiting norms (or mucking with norms by modifying the lengt
effect(also set /omitNorms="true"/ for your fields where you need this
feature)
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/to-prevent-number-of-matching-terms-in-contributing-score-tp3486373p3486512.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
rebuild the index from scratch. Since this is index time factor,
> you
> need to build complete index from scratch.
>
> Regds
> Pravesh
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/to-prevent-number-of-matching-terms-in-contributing-score-
Did you rebuild the index from scratch. Since this is index time factor, you
need to build complete index from scratch.
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/to-prevent-number-of-matching-terms-in-contributing-score-tp3486373p3486447.html
Sent from
Hi everyone!
We are working on Solr - 3.4.
In Short: If my query term matches more than one words I want it to be
considered as one match (in a particular field).
Details:
Our index has a multi-valued field "category" which contains possible
category names of the company. It is entered by th
10 matches
Mail list logo