On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
have you checked callers and ensure that the change from EACCES to EPERM
won't be a problem?
Only ipsec_set_policy() returns EPERM instead of EACCES now, and I
don't think it should be a problem.
don't think?
hi,
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
have you checked callers and ensure that the change from EACCES to EPERM
won't be a problem?
Only ipsec_set_policy() returns EPERM instead of EACCES now, and I
don't think it should be a problem.
don't
hi,
Module Name: src
Committed By: elad
Date: Wed May 6 21:41:59 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/netinet: ip_output.c
src/sys/netinet6: ip6_output.c ip6_var.h ipsec.c ipsec.h raw_ip6.c
udp6_output.c
Log Message:
Remove some usage of priv and
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
isn't KAUTH_REQ_NETWORK_SOCKET_RAWSOCK being deprecated in favor of _OPEN?
I'm still trying to decide, that's why I used this one (so removing it
causes errors).
On one hand, it would be nice to centralize
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
That said, where we now return EPERM is where in the future we'll
return the error value returned by kauth(9), like many many other
places in the kernel. Other parts of the networking stacks (say,
opening a raw
hi,
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 05:18:26AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: yamt
Date: Sun May 10 05:18:26 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/nfs: nfs_vnops.c
Log Message:
nfs_lookup: vn_lock the vnode returned by
Simon Burge sim...@netbsd.org writes:
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
[ ... ] Encrypted swap should
be the default -- either using cgd or by simply encrypting the blocks as
they go in and out without using the cgd layer.
You've benchmarked the effect of this, especially on older hardware?
No, but
Mihai Chelaru wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: kefren
Date: Fri May 8 05:18:34 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/dist/ipf/netinet: ip_fil_netbsd.c
Log Message:
Don't call callout_stop() without callout_init()
Fixes PR/41364
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 04:31:34AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
have you tried to convince freebsd guys to use your preferred name?
being different creates another layer of confusion.
We had a short discussion about this during BSDCan. Kirk didn't mind and
if it should be reasonable to get
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
[...] since there's no way of changing a PGP passphrase
short of generating a new key.
Huh? Sure, you have a need to deal with keyring copies from before
the change, maybe with some more rm -P and its limtations, but
otherwise,
In message: 20090510220227.gd16...@britannica.bec.de
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de writes:
: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 04:31:34AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
: have you tried to convince freebsd guys to use your preferred name?
: being different creates another layer of
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 07:51:41PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I've missed much of the discussion, can someone recap exactly what
you'd like to see changed? That would be the starting point for any
user-visisble changes to FreeBSD...
There is currently a mixed naming convention when refering
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:55:03AM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:09:40AM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
[...] since there's no way of changing a PGP passphrase
short of generating a new key.
In message: 20090511015855.gd16...@britannica.bec.de
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de writes:
: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 07:51:41PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: I've missed much of the discussion, can someone recap exactly what
: you'd like to see changed? That would be
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:11:03PM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:55:03AM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:09:40AM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
[...] since there's no
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 07:51:41AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
So really should simply document the option DRM_NO_AGP rather than
telling folks to include unnecessary drivers!
Just because it compiles doesn't mean it works properly. For most
drivers at least, you really need
16 matches
Mail list logo
