On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:23:20PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:09:38PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> > Anyway, here is a first cut on an "explicit_bzero" function
> > which doesn't get optimized away. I've put it to src/common
> > because the same thing makes s
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 01:13:10PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Nov 30, 12:13pm, bou...@antioche.eu.org (Manuel Bouyer) wrote:
...
> Keeps the headers tidy, and it will make it easy in the future to delete
> compatibility code. I would also move the compat code somewhere too,
> and call a fun
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:50:14PM +, David Laight wrote:
> I'd rather the .c file wasn't polluted with #ifdefs.
> Probably better to #define fss_compat_ioctl(...) EINVAL somewhere.
>
> We ought to sort out a way of making the compat code loadable
> - in which case this would need to be a real
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:42:49PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:50:14PM +, David Laight wrote:
> > I'd rather the .c file wasn't polluted with #ifdefs.
> > Probably better to #define fss_compat_ioctl(...) EINVAL somewhere.
> >
> > We ought to sort out a way of makin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:00:22PM -0600, David Young wrote:
>
> IIRC, our module loader cannot (yet) load a strong alias over a weak
> alias and restore the weak alias when the module containing the strong
> alias is unloaded. That would have been nice to have when bpf was
> modularized.
That w
On Dec 1, 5:50pm, da...@l8s.co.uk (David Laight) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev
| I'd rather the .c file wasn't polluted with #ifdefs.
| Probably better to #define fss_compat_ioctl(...) EINVAL somewhere.
|
| We ought to sort out a way of making the compat code loadable
| - in whi
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:50:14PM +, David Laight wrote:
> I'd rather the .c file wasn't polluted with #ifdefs.
> Probably better to #define fss_compat_ioctl(...) EINVAL somewhere.
>
> We ought to sort out a way of making the compat code loadable
> - in which case this would need to be a