Re: [Spacewalk-devel] [PATCH] Has signed Metadata

2011-03-21 Thread Michael Mraka
Michael Calmer wrote: % Hello, % % the attached patch set implements checking of signed metadata before mirroring % with spacewalk-repo-sync. % This patch adds a checkbox in Manage Repositories. If this checkbox is % checked, spacewalk-repo-sync expects, that the repo metadata are signed and

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] [PATCH] Has signed Metadata

2011-03-21 Thread Michael Mraka
Michael Calmer wrote: % Hello, % % the attached patch set implements checking of signed metadata before mirroring % with spacewalk-repo-sync. % This patch adds a checkbox in Manage Repositories. If this checkbox is % checked, spacewalk-repo-sync expects, that the repo metadata are signed and

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] [PATCH] Has signed Metadata

2011-03-21 Thread Michael Mraka
Michael Mraka wrote: % Michael Calmer wrote: % % Hello, % % % % the attached patch set implements checking of signed metadata before mirroring % % with spacewalk-repo-sync. % % This patch adds a checkbox in Manage Repositories. If this checkbox is % % checked, spacewalk-repo-sync expects, that

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] [PATCH] Has signed Metadata

2011-03-21 Thread Michael Calmer
Hi, Am Montag, 21. März 2011, 15:28:49 schrieb Michael Mraka: Michael Mraka wrote: % Michael Calmer wrote: % % Hello, % % % Hi Michael, % % your second patch failed to apply on today's master HEAD (namely % b9d72a78d8084df93c90cd365ca24b776306eb15). % % I tried to apply it on older

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] [PATCH] Has signed Metadata

2011-03-21 Thread Michael Mraka
% % Hello, % % % % the attached patch set implements checking of signed metadata before mirroring % % with spacewalk-repo-sync. % % This patch adds a checkbox in Manage Repositories. If this checkbox is % % checked, spacewalk-repo-sync expects, that the repo metadata are signed and % % try to

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] [PATCH] Has signed Metadata

2011-03-21 Thread Michael Mraka
Michael Calmer wrote: % Hi, ... % Similary hunk #4 starts with % %@@ -106,3 +124,142 @@ class ContentSource: % um = UpdateMetadata() % um.add(self.repo, all=True) % return um.notices % % which code is missing in spacewalk master. % % yes, all this is part

[Spacewalk-devel] new HTML5 attributes: autofocus, placeholder and required

2011-03-21 Thread Miroslav Suchy
I stumbled upon: http://www.quirksmode.org/html5/inputs.html and I wonder whether we want to use some those new attributes? While new types and tags are out of question, as we need to support old browsers, these new attributes are pretty safe - if browser does not support it, it will be

[Spacewalk-devel] rhn_register vs. up2date --register @ RHEL(3,4)

2011-03-21 Thread Miroslav Suchy
We have in several strings this text: Please run rhn_register (or up2date --register on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 or later) and I wonder what is difference between: rhn_register and up2date --register on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (as 3 is EOL). Both works there. Looking at the source code

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] rhn_register vs. up2date --register @ RHEL(3, 4)

2011-03-21 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:19:48PM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote: We have in several strings this text: Please run rhn_register (or up2date --register on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 or later) and I wonder what is difference between: rhn_register and up2date --register on Red Hat