Howdy team,
We in GSS are currently working a sev1 case from Comcast, which
customer are hitting the 503 HTTP error pages when trying to access the
system tab on the webUI for Satellite 5.4. All the other functions (yum,
create channel, etc) works as expected.
[Fri May 20 14:30:00 2011] [err
Julian Einwag - rockenstein AG writes:
> So basically the following in ANSI syntax would be equivalent:
> select web_customer.id, web_contact.id
> from web_customer left join web_contact on web_customer.id = web_contact.id
> and 1 = web_contact.id
I've never been perfectly clear about how Orac
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:49:31PM +, Julian Einwag - rockenstein AG wrote:
>
> So basically the following in ANSI syntax would be equivalent:
>
> select web_customer.id, web_contact.id
> from web_customer left join web_contact on web_customer.id = web_contact.id
> and 1 = web_contact.id
R
On 24.05.2011, at 14:26, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> Think of it as if you had
>
> (
> select :user_id from dual
> )
>
> and an outer join of this subselect with that USGP.
>
> The
>
> AND :user_id = USGP.user_id (+)
>
> matches where the USGP.user_id is the same as :user_i
On 05/23/2011 04:45 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Ionuț Arțăriși wrote:
On 05/18/2011 05:05 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:38:54PM +0200, Ionuț Arțăriși wrote:
On 05/18/2011 01:14 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
...
Nack. This is SQL-injecti
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:14:16PM +, Julian Einwag - rockenstein AG wrote:
>
> I just came across the query "visible_to_system" in SystemGroup_queries.xml:
>
> SELECT MAX(DECODE(VSGM.server_id, :sid, 1, 0)) is_system_member,
> VSGM.GROUP_ID id,
> VSGM.GROUP_NAME,
>
Hi,
I just came across the query "visible_to_system" in SystemGroup_queries.xml:
SELECT MAX(DECODE(VSGM.server_id, :sid, 1, 0)) is_system_member,
VSGM.GROUP_ID id,
VSGM.GROUP_NAME,
VSGM.GROUP_TYPE,
VSGM.CURRENT_MEMBERS,
VSGM.MAX_MEMBERS,
DEC
Hi,
Am Montag, 21. März 2011, 15:56:50 schrieb Michael Mraka:
> Michael Calmer wrote:
> % Hi,
> ...
> %
> % I would suggest, that we go step by step. So let's wait until "weak deps"
> % and
> % "updateinfo to errata" is applied. After this I will submit a new patch
> % for this feature based on
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Pazdziora"
> To: spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:52:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Replacement for tanukiwrapper
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:39:16AM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> > Premature notice:
> > I discovered
Dne 24.5.2011 09:52, Jan Pazdziora napsal(a):
Do we need it at all? Wouldn't two startup scripts (taskomatic and the
search server) plus log4j achieve the same, without a dependency on
the external piece of software?
It is not as easy as it looks(*). At least for me. I tried that and
after 15
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:39:16AM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> Premature notice:
> I discovered free fork of tanukiwrapper:
> https://bitbucket.org/ivertex/java-service-wrapper
> And I have intention to replace tanukiwrapper with
> java-service-wrapper as soon as it pass package review:
> https:
Premature notice:
I discovered free fork of tanukiwrapper:
https://bitbucket.org/ivertex/java-service-wrapper
And I have intention to replace tanukiwrapper with java-service-wrapper
as soon as it pass package review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132
Mirek
12 matches
Mail list logo
