Hey Silvio,
- Original Message -
> On 08/28/2013 07:42 PM, Grant Gainey wrote:
> > Fixing the tests to be more explicit and less reliant on "typical setups"
> > is, at least in my opinion, always a good thing.
>
> I am glad to hear that, as at the moment that's exactly what I am doing!
>
On 08/28/2013 07:42 PM, Grant Gainey wrote:
> Fixing the tests to be more explicit and less reliant on "typical setups" is,
> at least in my opinion, always a good thing.
I am glad to hear that, as at the moment that's exactly what I am doing!
I attach three patches that go just in that directio
- Original Message -
> Hello,
> We are currently in the process of overhauling our test infrastructure
> downstream, and among other things we are trying to run upstream Java
> unit tests in order to spot regressions.
>
> We noticed that some of the tests, for example
> UserFactoryTest.t
Hello,
We are currently in the process of overhauling our test infrastructure
downstream, and among other things we are trying to run upstream Java
unit tests in order to spot regressions.
We noticed that some of the tests, for example
UserFactoryTest.testSatelliteHasUsers() or ChannelTest.testIsP