3) open a cold one and call it a day.
One step ahead of you. :D
--
Jason Dobies
RHN Satellite / Spacewalk
RHCE# 805008743336126
Freenode: jdob @ #spacewalk #spacewalk-devel
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redh
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:06:37AM -0400, Jason Dobies wrote:
>> Isn't the main problem here the fact that whatever limit you chose, if
>> the original channel is at or near the limit, the cloned one will be
>> over limit? So the real fix is to
>>
>> - match the textfield length in the WebUI to the
I guess the debate was how big is big enough? At what point do
we stop? If we make it 256 and we get to cloning a channel that
creates a name of 257 what then? We're back in the same place
we started?
My original intent is getting lost. I'm not suggesting that increasing
it is the ultimate solu
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:21:45PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 09:07:13AM -0400, Jason Dobies wrote:
> >> Before we open up this can of worms again look at this bug:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459827 (sorry private bug)
> >>
> >> jesus
> >
> > "I
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 09:07:13AM -0400, Jason Dobies wrote:
>> Before we open up this can of worms again look at this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459827 (sorry private bug)
>>
>> jesus
>
> "Increasing the length of the column probably isn't the right solution. "
>
> Is
Isn't the main problem here the fact that whatever limit you chose, if
the original channel is at or near the limit, the cloned one will be
over limit? So the real fix is to
- match the textfield length in the WebUI to the column width,
whatever that one is;
- if the generated name would end up
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 09:07:13AM -0400, Jason Dobies wrote:
>> Before we open up this can of worms again look at this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459827 (sorry private bug)
>>
>> jesus
>
> "Increasing the length of the column probably isn't the right solution. "
>
> Is
Before we open up this can of worms again look at this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459827 (sorry private bug)
jesus
"Increasing the length of the column probably isn't the right solution. "
Is there more to it than that (referring to the can of worms comment,
I'm guessi
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Jason Dobies wrote:
>>
>> I'm taking a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498467
>>
>> In short, when we clone a channel we default the name to "Clone of *". For
>> certain Red Hat channels, this results in a channel name th
Jason Dobies wrote:
I'm taking a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498467
In short, when we clone a channel we default the name to "Clone of *".
For certain Red Hat channels, this results in a channel name that's
longer than the limit (64 characters).
Of course, one approac
I'm taking a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498467
In short, when we clone a channel we default the name to "Clone of *".
For certain Red Hat channels, this results in a channel name that's
longer than the limit (64 characters).
Of course, one approach is to make sure the
11 matches
Mail list logo