Hello,
I've pushed new Makefile.git code to the repository.
Well, I have pushed it as Makefile.git2, so if you want to try it (and
I'd appreciate if you did), please do
ln -sf Makefile.git2 rel-eng/Makefile.git
ln -s rel-eng/Makefile
Everything which worked before should be wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:27:23 +0100
Jan Pazdziora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've pushed new Makefile.git code to the repository.
>
> Well, I have pushed it as Makefile.git2, so if you want to try it (and
> I'd appreciate if you did),
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Devan Goodwin wrote:
> >
> > I'll appreciate if you try the new code and if you tell me your
> > thoughts.
>
> Found a very tiny problem only with echo's, USER_NAME doesn't seem to
> be defined in any of the new scripts so the echos for missing changelog
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed new Makefile.git code to the repository.
Well, I have pushed it as Makefile.git2, so if you want to try it (and
I'd appreciate if you did), please do
ln -sf Makefile.git2 rel-eng/Makefile.git
ln -s rel-eng/Makefile
Everything which worke
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
How does this compare to the build.py stuff we added?
The formula for comparability is:
Makefile.git > build.py
:)
--
Miroslav Suchy
RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redha
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> How does this compare to the build.py stuff we added?
>
> The formula for comparability is:
> Makefile.git > build.py
> :)
Then let's pick one or the other. Having two is confusing. While
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:36:04 -0500
"Jesus M. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> How does this compare to the build.py stuff we ad
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:27:23PM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> I've pushed new Makefile.git code to the repository.
>
> Well, I have pushed it as Makefile.git2, so if you want to try it (and
> I'd appreciate if you did), please do
>
> ln -sf Makefile.git2 rel-eng/Makefile.git
> l
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:14:32PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> I'll appreciate if you try the new code and if you tell me your
>> thoughts.
>
> How does this compare to the build.py stuff we added?
> While I prefer the build.py (as I can work more easily with python than
> make), I don't
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
However, if build.py is what you guys want and what you guys will
develop and maintain, so be it. Just put the info to the wiki and
I'll switch to using that. Until that happens, I'm ready to
maintain and improve Makefile.git.
Err. Am I missing something? Neither you nor D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:54:12 +0100
Jan Pazdziora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:14:32PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> I'll appreciate if you try the new code and if you tell me your
> >> thoughts.
> >
> > How does
11 matches
Mail list logo