Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-25 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:27:23 +0100 Jan Pazdziora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've pushed new Makefile.git code to the repository. > > Well, I have pushed it as Makefile.git2, so if you want to try it (and > I'd appreciate if you did),

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-25 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Devan Goodwin wrote: > > > > I'll appreciate if you try the new code and if you tell me your > > thoughts. > > Found a very tiny problem only with echo's, USER_NAME doesn't seem to > be defined in any of the new scripts so the echos for missing changelog

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-25 Thread Jesus M. Rodriguez
Jan Pazdziora wrote: Hello, I've pushed new Makefile.git code to the repository. Well, I have pushed it as Makefile.git2, so if you want to try it (and I'd appreciate if you did), please do ln -sf Makefile.git2 rel-eng/Makefile.git ln -s rel-eng/Makefile Everything which worke

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-26 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: How does this compare to the build.py stuff we added? The formula for comparability is: Makefile.git > build.py :) -- Miroslav Suchy RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redha

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-26 Thread Jesus M. Rodriguez
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> How does this compare to the build.py stuff we added? > > The formula for comparability is: > Makefile.git > build.py > :) Then let's pick one or the other. Having two is confusing. While

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-26 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:36:04 -0500 "Jesus M. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >> How does this compare to the build.py stuff we ad

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-26 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:27:23PM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > > I've pushed new Makefile.git code to the repository. > > Well, I have pushed it as Makefile.git2, so if you want to try it (and > I'd appreciate if you did), please do > > ln -sf Makefile.git2 rel-eng/Makefile.git > l

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-26 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:14:32PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> I'll appreciate if you try the new code and if you tell me your >> thoughts. > > How does this compare to the build.py stuff we added? > While I prefer the build.py (as I can work more easily with python than > make), I don't

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-27 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Jan Pazdziora wrote: However, if build.py is what you guys want and what you guys will develop and maintain, so be it. Just put the info to the wiki and I'll switch to using that. Until that happens, I'm ready to maintain and improve Makefile.git. Err. Am I missing something? Neither you nor D

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New Makefile.git(2) committed

2008-11-27 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:54:12 +0100 Jan Pazdziora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:14:32PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >> I'll appreciate if you try the new code and if you tell me your > >> thoughts. > > > > How does