Hi All
Environment
SpaceWalkVersion: 2.5
O/Sversion:OEL5.x(Oracle Enterprise Linux)
We are facing an issue withslow repository build for all the OEL5.x clients.
Inf act client is building800MB of xml files as below mentioned.
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1958177
I was checking size of repodata on our production machine and I see the
biggest ones:
362M/var/cache/rhn/repodata/rhel-x86_64-workstation-6
350M/var/cache/rhn/repodata/rhel-x86_64-server-6
326M/var/cache/rhn/repodata/rhel-x86_64-server-6.7.z
rhel-x86_64-workstation-6 contains 19521 p
Hi,
> On 4 Aug 2016, at 9:36 PM, Malla Reddy Madupu wrote:
>
> We are facing an issue with slow repository build for all the OEL5.x clients.
> Inf act client is building 800MB of xml files as below mentioned.
This is a known issue with the OL5 (not OEL) latest repository. It's HUGE. We
are wo
Hey Thomas,
> On 5 Aug 2016, at 3:16 AM, Tomas Lestach wrote:
>
> 800M repodata looks to be a lot. How many packages are in that channel? If
> it's a public repository, can you share the url, so I can sync it and check
> size the generated repodata and whether I'll find something odd there?
I
Hi Avi
Thank you very much for your reply and your kind help isgreatly appreciated.
As per your suggestion, I would like to create newrepositories ol5_u11_base and
ol5_u11_patch instead of "OEL5_x86_64_latest", could youplease share the
complete URLs and how can I use the both repos in on
Hi Thomas
Thank you very much for your reply.
Actually this is a Oracle Enterprise Linux O/S not RHEL and the total number of
packages are in this repository are 38916here's the URL:
"http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL5/latest/x86_64/repodata/";
Best RegardsMalla
On Monday, Au
Hi,
You need an active CSI and ULN access to synchronise the Base/Patch channels. I
don't recommend combining them into a single channel. Rather, you link a parent
OL5U11 channel to the ol5_u11_base channel on ULN and then create a child
ol5_u11_patch channel.
This is discussing in the Concept
Hi,
> On 8 Aug 2016, at 2:30 PM, Malla Reddy Madupu wrote:
>
> Actually this is a Oracle Enterprise Linux O/S not RHEL and the total number
> of packages are in this repository are 38916
> here's the URL:
> "http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL5/latest/x86_64/repodata/";
Note that
Hi Avi
I am not combining any channels in fact in another email thread, i have shared
the screens for the Space-Walk repo and Oracle repo. both are not matching. If
the channel has 11942 packages it's really great to hear and it's almost 70%
lesser than from what we have currently with our spac
Hi,
We cannot reproduce this issue internally. In our Spacewalk testing, a client
connected to a channel that only syncs from ol5_x86_64_latest creates almost
exactly the same metadata as if it were directly connected to yum.oracle.com or
ULN.
But yes, it creates about 1.6GB of data:
-rw-r--r
Thank you Avi
What is your suggestion here to move forward with OL5x? BTW, we are not using
the UEK kernel hence "ol5_u11_base" channels may not be helpful for us. other
than Unbreakable channels, can we use any?
If you want any further information from my end for Sapcewalk server/ client, I
am
On 08/10/2016 01:25 AM, Avi Miller wrote:
Hi,
We cannot reproduce this issue internally. In our Spacewalk testing, a client
connected to a channel that only syncs from ol5_x86_64_latest creates almost
exactly the same metadata as if it were directly connected to yum.oracle.com or
ULN.
But ye
Hi All
Yes, I have removed/ deleted all the packages with the OEL5x_latest and re
synchronized back with the 11937 packages. Now, it's lill better but however
it's same 1.6 GB of sql lite file generating over the client side. is there a
way to control not to generate such a huge files every time
Hi Avi
Can i run this command to clean the orphaned packages over the spacewalk server
side?$ "spacewalk-data-fsck -r -S -C -O"Best RegardsMalla
On Monday, August 15, 2016 10:43 AM, Malla Reddy Madupu
wrote:
Hi All
Yes, I have removed/ deleted all the packages with the OEL5x_latest and
Hi Avi
I have re synchronized the OEL5 latest channel, now the packages are the 11973
only, however when i build/ sync the OEL5x client (Physical machine) it took
more than 30 min to build the repodata.
BTW, can I run the below command to clean the orphaned packages?
"spacewalk-data-fsck -r -S -
On 08/15/2016 08:21 AM, Malla Reddy Madupu wrote:
Hi *Avi*
I have re synchronized the OEL5 latest channel, now the packages are the
11973 only, however when i build/ sync the OEL5x client (Physical
machine) it took more than 30 min to build the repodata.
Yes, for the first time it takes so lon
16 matches
Mail list logo