Phillip Evans wrote:
Perhaps I'll have to go hunting through the ActivePerl source In
any case, the idea was to maintain the architecture/design of spamd just
move the stuff that ActivePerl doesn't do well (ie: fork) into an
environment that does do that well (ie: C++).
What happens when spamd
Yep, the threading issue was the one I picked as being the show-stopper.
Unix RPC is no big deal (just to be obtuse we could implement Windows named
pipes instead), syslog is no big deal and someone who writes Perl can fix
the logging routines.
I know what spamd is about and I thought it would be
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906
Summary: Courier Received header format not detected - causing
false positive on RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.61
Platform: PC
OS/Version: FreeBSD
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:38:17PM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
> No problem, wasn't sure about opening up a bug against current HEAD.
> Done now.
:) Yeah if it's a big piece of work, or the patch writer isn't a
committer, tickets are pretty much required.
Thanks. :)
> BTW, might want to modify
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:29:44PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> Thanks for the patch, but we can't accept it unless it's attached (not
> cut/paste) to a ticket in bugzilla and we have an Apache CLA on file
> for you (which we do, I just noticed...) :)
>
No problem, wasn't sure about opening
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2905
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-07 13:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=1662)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1662&action=view)
Patch
This also changes the example in SYNOPSIS.
Since
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2905
Summary: If rewrite_subject is set to anything, even 0, the
subject will be rewritten
Product: Spamassassin
Version: current-CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
> Quick fix for the recent rewrite_subject/rewrite_header stuffs, if
Thanks for the patch, but we can't accept it unless it's attached (not
cut/paste) to a ticket in bugzilla and we have an Apache CLA on file
for you (which we do, I j
Quick fix for the recent rewrite_subject/rewrite_header stuffs, if
rewrite_subject is set at all, even to 0 then it will always rewrite
the Subject line with whatever is currently set as the subject_tag.
It also fixes up the SYNOPSIS at the top since really rewrite_subject
is deprecated. Perhaps a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-07 12:55 ---
Subject: Re: bayes wont expire tokens properly
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:28:30PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately i cant give access to this mach
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:45:29PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> Michael -- is this in HEAD or b2_6_0 -- or both? Some changes
> were made to that code in HEAD.
>
Subversion HEAD, I'm currently at r4630.
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
>Howdy,
>
>I've been pulling my hair out trying to track down what I thought was
>an error in my AWL changes, but turns out isn't.
>
>The symptom is that from one run to the next (within a minute or so of
>each other with networ
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-07 12:33 ---
Unfortunately i cant give access to this machine as it is on an internal
network. How did you dump and load the data? Maybe i should try the same
method to see i
Howdy,
I've been pulling my hair out trying to track down what I thought was
an error in my AWL changes, but turns out isn't.
The symptom is that from one run to the next (within a minute or so of
each other with network tests turned off and clearing the AWL and
Bayes DBs) the AWL score for a mes
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-07 12:26 ---
Well, I don't exactly have the same environment, but ...
Took the original DB file, ran it through dump/load to get it converted to a
format my box can
understa
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Is it as easy as creating a second loopback, like 127.0.0.2? Anyone know the
Linux syntax for that?
I know that you can do a second IP on an ethernet interface by dealing
with eth0:0 instead of eth0, like the following example for a
/etc/network/interfaces on a Debian box:
Phillip Evans wrote:
I have been working on precisely this, sorta. I have taken a slightly
different tact, however, and re-implemented in C++ using Windows API calls
and am calling it spamcpp.
Not to minimize your work on this, but the Windows port of spamc is
working fine and is just about all c
--On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:25 PM -0600 Rich Puhek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm, I suppose you'd have to force the script to bind to a second IP
> Address on the same box, since I don't know how you'd point to a different
> port for DNS lookups.
Is it as easy as creating a second loo
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Nice!
Alas, I've already got a caching nameserver (BIND) running on the mailserver.
So I guess I'd have to run this on another box somewhere. What does one do if
one has only the one host?
Hmmm, I suppose you'd have to force the script to bind to a second IP
Address on the sa
--On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:41 AM -0600 Rich Puhek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://users.2z.net/rpuhek/scripts_public/zombietest_rbl.pl/
Nice!
Alas, I've already got a caching nameserver (BIND) running on the mailserver.
So I guess I'd have to run this on another box somewhere. What
(oops, looks like I sent this to the old dev list address... my bad).
Xavier Roche wrote:
Hi folks,
There seems to be a lots of mail recently sent by zombies machines
(mostly running Windows 2000, XP or ME) attackes by spammers and used as
spam relay.
(snip)
Ok, I've updated my RBL'ed version of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sander Striker writes:
>On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 04:07, Justin Mason wrote:
>> Sander Striker writes:
>> >On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 01:15, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday 31 December 2003 00:50 CET Sander Striker wrote:
>> >> > I probably need to r
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spamassassin-
|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904
Summary: bayes wont expire tokens properly
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.60
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> That's what was planned. 2.6x are just bugfix releases, so if we's encounter
> another *really* grave bug before we can release 2.70, we would have to do
> another 2.63, but that's pretty unlikely.
I wouldn't say "pretty unlikely
Hello all. I notice that there is a bit of work going on in the vicinity of
getting a Win32 port of spamc.
I have been working on precisely this, sorta. I have taken a slightly
different tact, however, and re-implemented in C++ using Windows API calls
and am calling it spamcpp. I did this mainl
Hi,
I was just wondering why it is not be possible to use both, virtual config
dirs and sql-based preferences with spamd? Actually, I made this work for
me with just a few changes in check():
@@ -655,10 +655,11 @@
if (!$opt{'user-config'})
{
- if ($o
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 09:43 CET Sander Striker wrote:
> I'm assuming 2.62 is the last non-ASF release? And the 2.6x line ends
> there aswell?
That's what was planned. 2.6x are just bugfix releases, so if we's encounter
another *really* grave bug before we can release 2.70, we would have t
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 05:57, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:10:48PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:57:28AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> > > - then, periodically (every month or so?):
> > > - diff sf.net 2.6x against most recent "up to date wi
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 04:07, Justin Mason wrote:
> Sander Striker writes:
> >On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 01:15, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 31 December 2003 00:50 CET Sander Striker wrote:
> >> > I probably need to read a doc, since the spamassassin status page is
> >> > still missing from t
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Messages to you from the spamassassin-dev mailing list seem to
have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
message I received.
If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounc
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2899
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-07 00:15 ---
Installing 2.61 from http://www.spamassassin.org/released/RPMs instead of the
redhat rpms appears to have solved the problem.
Thanx
--- You are receiving
Malte -
I see you checked in an update. There are a few problems remaining that
you would not be able to see without trying it under Windows:
In build/configure change w32.lib to w2_32.lib
(That was my typo originally. Sorry)
$ svn diff build/configure
Index: build/configure
=
Sander Striker writes:
>On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 01:15, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>> On Wednesday 31 December 2003 00:50 CET Sander Striker wrote:
>> > I probably need to read a doc, since the spamassassin status page is
>> > still missing from the incubator site. FWIW, you can look at that
>> > by doi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2903
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-06 18:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=1661)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1661&action=view)
resume email flagged as spam due to addr nums rules
ema
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2903
Summary: FROM_WEBMAIL_END_NUMS6 and ADDR_NUMS_AT_BIGSITE
excessive
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.60
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severi
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:31:22PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> Yep, agreed. And this is why I think we may not be able to maintain 2.6x
> in the apache.org SVN repository; because it will contain non-CLA'd
> portions.
But the code is already in the repo, and if we keep it up to date with
CVS, it
37 matches
Mail list logo
