On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:25:11 -0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
Charlie Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Uwe Willenbacher wrote:
>
>> Sorry to bug you, but I decided today to install the latest greatest
>>dev
>> version of SpamAssassin 2.1, however, I got following compile err
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Uwe Willenbacher wrote:
> Sorry to bug you, but I decided today to install the latest greatest dev
> version of SpamAssassin 2.1, however, I got following compile error:
>
> gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O Hi all,
Hi all,
Sorry to bug you, but I decided today to install the latest greatest dev
version of SpamAssassin 2.1, however, I got following compile error:
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O Hi all,
spamd/spamc.c \
-o spamd/sp
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Justin Stayton wrote:
> I'm wanting to have messages tagged by SpamAssassin to be sent to a
> specific mailbox (such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead of making it through
> to the original destination (address in "To:" field). Is this possible?
> And if so, how can this be imple
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> sendmail forks 10-15 procmails, which fork 10-15 spamcs, which fork 10-15
> spamds
>
> Spammer sends over 30 of these in under two minutes
I let postfix queue those up - I have postfix set to not have more than a
small number of delivery agents running
Hi Everyone,
I'm wanting to have messages tagged by SpamAssassin to be sent to a specific
mailbox (such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead of making it through to the
original destination (address in "To:" field). Is this possible? And if so,
how can this be implemented? Thanks.
Justin
This spam zapped through SA 2.1 with a value of 1.8.
I noticed the "X-Mailer: 007 Direct Email Easy" header - Googling it found
nothing but spam matches - and the following site sells it as a bulk mailer
- so that's sounds pretty damning.
http://tlc.mutualchange.com/email-marketing/e/i1/i71.htm
* Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-18T17:10-0800]:
> I was thinking that sendmail with milter might help with this problem, but
> installing sendmail 8.12.2 started to hurt my head. Would milter help?
> Would any other mailers handle this better?
Milter would probably help, or you can
Well, it looks like the suggested procmailrc changes did the trick! The
heretofore problematic IMDB message came through complete and just fine.
This is what I ended up with:
:0
* $RECIP ?? ^^kid@$DOMAIN
{
:0fw
| perl -I../www/blognet/lib ../spamassassin -c ~/.spamassassin -P
Recently, we've been the unfortunate recepients of several spams that are
sent so quickly as to cause spamassassin to overwhelm our mail server.
Here's what happens:
Spammer connects to smtp port, gives his helo and mail from, then gives
10-15 "rcpt to:"s, essentially bcc'ing a bunch of people o
I am wondering if anyone would be interested in a score which is not as high
for email addresses ending in numbers if the address is an @hotmail.com
email. The *vast* majority of hotmail addresses end in numbers which tends
to knock emails over the spam score.
I'm already knocking off 0.7 p
I had to do some weird stuff for that error. Maybe a perl guru could
set us all straight, but what I did was:
1. Installed the perl module Net::SMTP::Server
2. Copied the file
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Net/SMTP/Server/SmartHost.pm to
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAss
This message to the Babylon 5 Mailing list got flagged as spam, mostly due to
the 4-point match for %-escapes in an URL (HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST):
20_body_tests.cf:rawbody HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST /http\:\/\/[^\/]*%/
To make the regexp more valid, it should be something like:
/http\:\/\/[^\/\s:]*\%/
Craig Hughes wrote:
> Actually, we dropped Mail::Audit since it doesn't work in a variety of
> situations, and replaced it with our own version,
> Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit -- change the line to use
> that class instead
> (and the "use" line at the beginning of the file) and you
> should
Up around the top of the script where it says "use this; use that; use
the-other;" put in a line that says "use Mail::Audit;"
This only creates ONE process, though. The author has given me a copy
of a newer script he wrote that spawns children. It's very stable.
I've had it running here for ab
Yeah, that bug's already been fixed in CVS. I will be doing a new
release this week sometime I think. You can download the latest code
from http://www.spamassassin.org/ in the downloads page -- grab the
2.1CVS code -- it will more or less be what's distributed in the next
day or so. It is very
Hi, all.
I installed SpamAssassin earlier this morning, from CPAN. Everything is
working correctly, _except_ for my linux-kernel mbox. There are five
other mailboxes that are all being procmailed to their destination fine.
In the case of linux-kernel mail, the mail arrives in the box _missing_
On 17 Feb 2002 11:29:53 -0800 Craig Hughes wrote:
> I'll happily accept patches.
Yeah, I've been meaning to do it for several weeks now, but it's not going
to happen any time soon. I was hoping someone would see this and say "what
a great idea, I think I'll do that." Apparently not.
> In the
My bad, I failed to change the MANIFEST file when I removed MyMailAudit.pm,
so the "make dist" was failing. Fixed now. I'll upload the new dist
packages now, and they should rebuild automatically tonight sometime.
C
on 2/18/02 11:55 AM, Craig Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It looks like
on 2/18/02 11:31 AM, Stewart, John at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The author of Mail::Audit, Simon Cozens, commented:
>> Sounds like someone's forgot the "use Mail::Audit".
Actually, we dropped Mail::Audit since it doesn't work in a variety of
situations, and replaced it with our own version,
Mail
on 2/18/02 11:23 AM, Daniel Rogers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:29:53AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
>> I'll happily accept patches. In the meantime, killing spamd won't cause
>> any loss of mail, only loss of identification of spam messages for that
>> fraction of a se
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:25:19AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> I don't think anybody has done this yet, but it would actually be a really
> cool thing to have ... lots of spammers have a bunch of sender domains,
> but their MX servers are all on the same box.
My thought exactly.
> I didn't tak
It looks like the automated roll of CVS as the "unstable" build on the
spamassassin.org download page is broken. It's not up to date. It looks
like the last rebuild from CVS was Feb 11th. I'll see if I can figure out
what's going on, but I might need to get in touch with jm and hope he's in
an
on 2/18/02 9:04 AM, Greg Ward at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This one slipped through this morning with a score of just 1.5. (It now
> gets 4.5 since I reported it to Vipul's Razor -- still not enough!)
Yeah, I got a Sierra Leone scam the other day which scored 0! These guys
are getting very go
I am trying to install your spamproxyd so I can get SpamAssasssin working to
tag messages flowing through our postfix mail gateway (running on Solaris
2.6) to our internal Exchange server.
I installed SA 2.01, which as a simple application seems to work well.
However, when I tried to use spampro
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:53:08AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> >
> > > Some interesting discussion here. Apparently many freemail providers
> > > require the first character of your username to begin with
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:29:53AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> I'll happily accept patches. In the meantime, killing spamd won't cause
> any loss of mail, only loss of identification of spam messages for that
> fraction of a second when it's not listening, or for those messages
> already in proc
H ... I missed the gist of the thread here, but I work at a University
where all the students ideas are numeric, with a trailing alpha character
(##[a-z]@) ...
its the way its always been here, from long before I arrived ... but if
I'm getting an idea just from the subject, such a 'block
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:53:08AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
>
> > Some interesting discussion here. Apparently many freemail providers
> > require the first character of your username to begin with a letter, not a
> > number.
>
> > header FROM_INVAL
This one slipped through this morning with a score of just 1.5. (It now
gets 4.5 since I reported it to Vipul's Razor -- still not enough!)
I already have a rule /\b(china|korea|taiwan)\b/i in my personal config.
Time to add one for /\b(nigeria|zimbabwe)\b/i (I have seen a Zimbabwean
variation o
Hi Charlie,
> Have you tried setting the score for A_FROM_IN_AUTO_WLIST to 0,
> so it isn't tested?
Tested it, works! Thank you!
Best regards,
Christoph Conrad
--
TTi Entwicklungszentrum GmbH, Elisabethstr. 16, D-52062 Aachen
Fon: +49 241 47051-0 Fax: +49 241 47051-89 Web: http://www
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> > It seems I've been getting a lot of spam lately that has a valid MX,
> > but the MX is 127.0.0.1 (loopback). Any chance we could add a test for
> > this?
>
> That will break a large number of legitimate uses
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> It seems I've been getting a lot of spam lately that has a valid MX,
> but the MX is 127.0.0.1 (loopback). Any chance we could add a test for
> this?
That will break a large number of legitimate uses of email forwarding,
notably mine.[1]
I use the Unix
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> Some interesting discussion here. Apparently many freemail providers
> require the first character of your username to begin with a letter, not a
> number.
> header FROM_INVALID_FREEMAIL_USER From =~
>/^\d.*([hg]otmail|yahoo|netscape|msn|aol|algelfi
Hi Charlie,
> Have you tried setting the score for A_FROM_IN_AUTO_WLIST to 0,
> so it isn't tested?
No, not tried yet, but will do so!
> Are you trying to actually do delivery with spamassassin? I'm
> curious what other mail software you are running on that system.
My configura
Some interesting discussion here. Apparently many freemail providers
require the first character of your username to begin with a letter, not a
number.
I'm wondering if an even-more-generic "From begins with a number" test
would be useful for SpamAssassin.
There already is a FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS te
Hi,
i installed Spamassassin on GNU/Linux at the weekend and i am VERY
impressed. It works great.
I tried to install it on Windows but this failed due several reasons.
* There are several getpwuid which are not available on Windows NT
I found that they could be substituted by
;; SpamAssassin.
37 matches
Mail list logo
